ForNeVeR/Cesium - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

C compiler for the CLI platform

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 65/100

External PR Merge Rate: 88%

Response Time: 9d

First Timer Success: 80%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is ForNeVeR/Cesium welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

ForNeVeR/Cesium has a recorded first-timer success rate of 80.0%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in ForNeVeR/Cesium respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 204.3 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 65.3 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 65.3 places ForNeVeR/Cesium in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for ForNeVeR/Cesium?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for ForNeVeR/Cesium is 87.5%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in ForNeVeR/Cesium?

ForNeVeR/Cesium currently has 4 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

ForNeVeR
ForNeVeR/CesiumAWelcoming448
GitHub
Back to Explorer
ForNeVeR

ForNeVeR/Cesium

448
AWelcoming(65/100)C#

C compiler for the CLI platform

Compare
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Strict Architecture Gatekeeper

Warmth Score
7.1/10
Patience Score
7.8/10
Nitpick Rate
40%

Strict review standards in ForNeVeR/Cesium. Ensure PR scope matches issue requirements closely before requesting review.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
8 days+
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
87.5%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
80.0%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
2 core
Small core review team
Diagnostic Health HUD
87.5%
Merge Gauge
80.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe59/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for ForNeVeR/Cesium
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/ForNeVeR/Cesium)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/ForNeVeR/Cesium?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (5)

View on GitHub

Imagine the following C program: typedef enum Side { Side_L, Side_R } Side; I expect Side_L and Side_R to be available for .NET side: either Side type should be exported, or at least constants Side_L and Side_R should exist. I propose: let's start by exposing this as a real enum type. Note that the scope of this issue is to export the type purely for .NET interop purpose: this doesn't mean that the C functions accepting this enum's values have to be converted as well. It would be nice, surely, but I'm not sure what the consequences for the function pointer compatibility this might be. So, for now, let's just update the CLR metadata, and not use the values of this enum anywhere in the Cesium-generated IL code.

📅 Opened Aug 24, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 80/100Contribute

In C23, bool and _Bool are the same. See section 6.4.1 Keywords:

📅 Opened Aug 11, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 65/100Contribute

Reproduces in the app Tabularius, commit 5a10babce37e1d1165aec11efda052eed5208a72. If I try to open any UI form using Rider's Avalonia previewer integration, it throws an error: TypeLoadException: Could not load type 'System.Runtime.Versioning.TargetFrameworkAttribute' from assembly 'Tabularius.Interop.Dto, Version=0.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null'. System.TypeLoadException: Could not load type 'System.Runtime.Versioning.TargetFrameworkAttribute' from assembly 'Tabularius.Interop.Dto, Version=0.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null'.    at System.ModuleHandle.ResolveMethod(QCallModule module, Int32 methodToken, IntPtr* typeInstArgs, Int32 typeInstCount, IntPtr* methodInstArgs, Int32 methodInstCount)    at System.ModuleHandle.ResolveMethodHandleInternal(RuntimeModule module, Int32 methodToken, ReadOnlySpan`1 typeInstantiationContext, ReadOnlySpan`1 methodInstantiationContext)    at System.ModuleHandle.ResolveMethodHandle(Int32 methodToken, RuntimeTypeHandle[]

📅 Opened Aug 1, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Currently, the integration test suite on Windows periodically takes longer than 10 minutes, which is quite long. I have a hypothesis: does the MSVC compiler takes all that time? Or some of our compilation infrastructure? Whatever that is, we should optimize it somehow. And to know what to optimize, we should measure it. So, as the first step, let's measure the time taken by different stages of our integration tests on all the operating systems, and emit the results to some JSON file — so that we could download it from the CI and analyze. After having a timed breakdown, we'll see how to improve that time.

📅 Opened Apr 1, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 60/100Contribute

Cesium Compiler has an inherent ability to generate .runtimeconfig.json. This ability is implemented mostly for the console compiler use. Cesium SDK, on the other hand, relies on the .runtimeconfig.json generation introduced by the common .NET SDK (see #946 for details). In the logs produced when compiling a project via Cesium SDK, there are also traces of the .runtimeconfig.json being generated by the compiler — which is then subsequently ignored. To reduce the confusion, we should introduce an option for the compiler to skip generation of the .runtimeconfig.json — and this option should be utilized by the SDK, so that no redundant work is done or logged as being done. The behavior of the current command-line compiler (generate the .runtimeconfig.json by default) should be left as-is.

📅 Opened Feb 19, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 60/100Contribute
Looking for more C# beginner tasks?Explore C# GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for ForNeVeR/Cesium

When evaluating whether to contribute to ForNeVeR/Cesium, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of ForNeVeR/Cesium acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 8 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 87.5% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to ForNeVeR/Cesium

01

Is ForNeVeR/Cesium welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

ForNeVeR/Cesium has a recorded first-timer success rate of 80.0%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~8 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 65.3 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 65.3 places ForNeVeR/Cesium in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for ForNeVeR/Cesium?

The external pull request merge rate is 87.5%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in ForNeVeR/Cesium?

Yes, ForNeVeR/Cesium currently has 4 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for ForNeVeR/Cesium are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.