FengByX/Pawchive - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

🐾 Pawchive 第三方 Android 客户端。聚合 Patreon、Fanbox、Discord 等平台创作者内容,支持浏览发现、精准搜索、收藏同步、沉浸式媒体播放。采用 Kotlin + Material Design 3 + ExoPlayer 构建,支持中/英/日三语切换。

C-Rank Grade: D (Risky) - 23/100

External PR Merge Rate: -

Response Time: 5h

First Timer Success: -

Frequently Asked Questions

Is FengByX/Pawchive welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

FengByX/Pawchive has a recorded first-timer success rate of 0.0%. Repositories ranked D typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in FengByX/Pawchive respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 5.1 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 22.9 C-Rank™ score (D Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 22.9 places FengByX/Pawchive in the D tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for FengByX/Pawchive?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for FengByX/Pawchive is 0.0%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in FengByX/Pawchive?

FengByX/Pawchive does not currently have active "good first issue" tags indexed, but accepts external contributions through standard GitHub issue tracking.

FengByX
FengByX/PawchiveD•Risky104
GitHub
Back to Explorer
FengByX

FengByX/Pawchive

104
InactiveD•Risky(23/100)Kotlin

🐾 Pawchive 第三方 Android 客户端。聚合 Patreon、Fanbox、Discord 等平台创作者内容,支持浏览发现、精准搜索、收藏同步、沉浸式媒体播放。采用 Kotlin + Material Design 3 + ExoPlayer 构建,支持中/英/日三语切换。

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Active Open-Source Maintainer

Warmth Score
7.8/10
Patience Score
8.2/10
Nitpick Rate
20%

Active maintainer team in FengByX/Pawchive welcoming community pull requests and bug fixes.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with repository style conventions
  • •Keep PRs focused and well-documented

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit unlinked PRs without context
  • •Do not break existing automated test suites
Response Velocity
5 hours
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
0.0%
Selective PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
0.0%
No first-timer merges recorded in window

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
1 core
Single maintainer review bottleneck
Diagnostic Health HUD
0.0%
Merge Gauge
0.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe26/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for FengByX/Pawchive
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/FengByX/Pawchive)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/FengByX/Pawchive?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (0)

View on GitHub

No cached good first issues currently tracked for FengByX/Pawchive.

View all good first issues directly on GitHub

Looking for more Kotlin beginner tasks?Explore Kotlin GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for FengByX/Pawchive

When evaluating whether to contribute to FengByX/Pawchive, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of FengByX/Pawchive acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 5 hours. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 0.0% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to FengByX/Pawchive

01

Is FengByX/Pawchive welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

FengByX/Pawchive has a recorded first-timer success rate of 0.0%. Repositories ranked Risky typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~5 hours. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 22.9 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 22.9 places FengByX/Pawchive in the Risky tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for FengByX/Pawchive?

The external pull request merge rate is 0.0%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in FengByX/Pawchive?

FengByX/Pawchive does not have open beginner labels indexed currently, but external PRs for bugs and documentation improvements are evaluated via normal issue triage.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for FengByX/Pawchive are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.