FeatherCMS/feather - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Feather is a modern Swift-based Content Management System.

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 56/100

External PR Merge Rate: 70%

Response Time: 5d

First Timer Success: 100%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is FeatherCMS/feather welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

FeatherCMS/feather has a recorded first-timer success rate of 100.0%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in FeatherCMS/feather respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 112.7 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 55.7 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 55.7 places FeatherCMS/feather in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for FeatherCMS/feather?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for FeatherCMS/feather is 69.6%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in FeatherCMS/feather?

FeatherCMS/feather currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

FeatherCMS
FeatherCMS/featherA•Welcoming607
GitHub
Back to Explorer
FeatherCMS

FeatherCMS/feather

607
InactiveA•Welcoming(56/100)Swift

Feather is a modern Swift-based Content Management System.

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Active Open-Source Mentor

Warmth Score
7.8/10
Patience Score
8.2/10
Nitpick Rate
25%

Growing Swift project in FeatherCMS/feather welcoming community pull requests and bug fixes.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with Swift style conventions
  • •Keep PRs scoped and well-documented
  • •Include relevant test coverage for changes

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit unlinked PRs without context
  • •Do not break existing automated test suites
  • •Do not mix unrelated refactors with feature work
Response Velocity
4 days+
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
69.6%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
100.0%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
2 core
Small core review team
Diagnostic Health HUD
69.6%
Merge Gauge
100.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe58/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for FeatherCMS/feather
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/FeatherCMS/feather)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/FeatherCMS/feather?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (1)

View on GitHub

Reduce redundancy in generated OpenAPI definition names Problem Generated OpenAPI definitions repeat the same hierarchy in every type name. This is not limited to schemas. The same pattern appears across: Operations Path items Parameters Request bodies Responses Schemas Tags For example: WebMenuCreateOperation WebMenuUpdateOperation WebMenuIdPathItems WebMenuCreateRequestBody WebMenuDetailResponse WebMenuCreateSchema WebMenuTag Repeating the resource hierarchy in every generated type makes the code unnecessarily verbose and increases the risk of inconsistent naming or typos. Proposal Generate nested namespaces that mirror the OpenAPI resource hierarchy. For example: enum Web { enum Menu { struct CreateOperation: OperationRepresentable { ... } struct UpdateOperation: OperationRepresentable { ... } struct IdPathItems: PathItemRepresentable { ... } struct CreateRequestBody: RequestBodyRepresentable { ... } struct DetailResponse: JSONRespons

📅 Opened Jul 31, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 40/100Contribute
Looking for more Swift beginner tasks?Explore Swift GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for FeatherCMS/feather

When evaluating whether to contribute to FeatherCMS/feather, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of FeatherCMS/feather acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 4 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 69.6% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to FeatherCMS/feather

01

Is FeatherCMS/feather welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

FeatherCMS/feather has a recorded first-timer success rate of 100.0%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~4 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 55.7 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 55.7 places FeatherCMS/feather in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for FeatherCMS/feather?

The external pull request merge rate is 69.6%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in FeatherCMS/feather?

Yes, FeatherCMS/feather currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for FeatherCMS/feather are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.