Far-Beyond-Pulsar/Pulsar-Native - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

The next-generation game engine that you deserve implemented in rust https://pulsarnative.com/ Developer_Blogs: https://pulsarnative.com/blog/ Research: https://pulsarnative.com/Research/ UI-Framework: https://pulsarnative.com/UI/

C-Rank Grade: S (Elite) - 72/100

External PR Merge Rate: 91%

Response Time: 1d

First Timer Success: 100%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Far-Beyond-Pulsar/Pulsar-Native welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

Far-Beyond-Pulsar/Pulsar-Native has a recorded first-timer success rate of 100.0%. Repositories ranked S typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in Far-Beyond-Pulsar/Pulsar-Native respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 30.9 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 72.4 C-Rankâ„¢ score (S Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 72.4 places Far-Beyond-Pulsar/Pulsar-Native in the S tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for Far-Beyond-Pulsar/Pulsar-Native?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for Far-Beyond-Pulsar/Pulsar-Native is 90.6%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in Far-Beyond-Pulsar/Pulsar-Native?

Far-Beyond-Pulsar/Pulsar-Native currently has 10 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

Far-Beyond-Pulsar
Far-Beyond-Pulsar/Pulsar-NativeS•Elite379
GitHub
Back to Explorer
Far-Beyond-Pulsar

Far-Beyond-Pulsar/Pulsar-Native

379
S•Elite(72/100)Rust

The next-generation game engine that you deserve implemented in rust https://pulsarnative.com/ Developer_Blogs: https://pulsarnative.com/blog/ Research: https://pulsarnative.com/Research/ UI-Framework: https://pulsarnative.com/UI/

Compare•
Jump to:
Response Velocity
1 days+
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
90.6%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
100.0%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
6 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
90.6%
Merge Gauge
100.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe73/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for Far-Beyond-Pulsar/Pulsar-Native
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/Far-Beyond-Pulsar/Pulsar-Native)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/Far-Beyond-Pulsar/Pulsar-Native?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (5)

View on GitHub

Description The viewport camera controls (right-click drag for rotation, middle-click drag for panning) do not work on native Wayland sessions without XWayland. Root Cause The viewport input thread uses raw X11 FFI calls (XQueryPointer, XWarpPointer, XGrabPointer) for cursor position querying, warping, and confinement. These functions only work under X11 or XWayland — they silently fail or are unavailable on native Wayland. Affected code paths crates/editor/ui_level_editor/src/level_editor/ui/viewport/platform.rs — mod x11 (lines 454+): all cursor manipulation functions (lock_cursor_to_window, set_cursor_position, get_cursor_position, hide_cursor, etc.) crates/editor/ui_level_editor/src/level_editor/ui/viewport/mod.rs — spawn_input_thread_once() mouse poll section: uses get_cursor_position() + set_cursor_position() for delta computation What works on Wayland WASD keyboard movement (reads /dev/input via device_query) Mouse click selection (GPUI/winit Wayland events) Scroll whee

📅 Opened Aug 17, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Components in the level editor are not allowed to have unique field values when multiple components of a type are present by the current engine: This will no doubt be fixed during the SceneDB overhauls

📅 Opened Aug 8, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 75/100Contribute

Introduction The scripting engine is the final piece that allows gameplay code; whether written in Rust or authored through Blueprints; to interact with the world at runtime. Rather than exposing raw pointers or direct object references, gameplay code will operate on lightweight references that internally resolve to handles into SceneDB. These handles provide stable access to actors and their components while allowing SceneDB to remain the authoritative source of truth for object lifetime, serialization, networking, and editor integration. Once a reference has been resolved, the scripting runtime will be able to invoke methods on actors, query and modify component data, and interact with reflected types through the Pulsar Reflection system. This architecture provides a unified programming model regardless of whether gameplay logic originates from native Rust code or Blueprint graphs. Every scripting backend ultimately communicates through the same reflection layer, ensuring consistent

📅 Opened Aug 6, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

The level editor hierarchy For reference The blueprint plugin does this perfectly so this may be a place to ref for a rework of the penal in the level editor

📅 Opened Aug 6, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 75/100Contribute

Summary All 6 plugin vendor crates have zero translation support — no rust-i18n dependency, no t!() calls, no locale files. Collectively they contain ~300+ hardcoded English UI strings that cannot be localized. This was previously tracked in #63 ("We need a way for plugin UI to support localization") which was closed, but the underlying gap remains. Affected crates and estimated hardcoded strings Crate Est. Strings Key examples blueprint_editor ~100+ Toolbar (Save, Compile, Debug), palette search, properties panel, overlay zoom/debug, prefab/event/macro panels shader_editor ~50+ Toolbar (Save, Compile, Reload), panel titles, palette, properties, compilation messages, overlay zoom table_editor ~30+ Query editor toolbar (Execute, Clear, Export CSV/JSON), row actions (Add, Duplicate, Delete) Common patterns All crates hardcode strings via these patterns: .child("English text") — text nodes .tooltip("English text") — button tooltips .label("English text") — button la

📅 Opened Jul 30, 2026💬 3 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute
Looking for more Rust beginner tasks?Explore Rust GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for Far-Beyond-Pulsar/Pulsar-Native

When evaluating whether to contribute to Far-Beyond-Pulsar/Pulsar-Native, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of Far-Beyond-Pulsar/Pulsar-Native acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 1 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 90.6% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to Far-Beyond-Pulsar/Pulsar-Native

01

Is Far-Beyond-Pulsar/Pulsar-Native welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

Far-Beyond-Pulsar/Pulsar-Native has a recorded first-timer success rate of 100.0%. Repositories ranked Elite typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~1 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 72.4 C-Rankâ„¢ score represent?

The C-Rankâ„¢ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 72.4 places Far-Beyond-Pulsar/Pulsar-Native in the Elite tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for Far-Beyond-Pulsar/Pulsar-Native?

The external pull request merge rate is 90.6%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in Far-Beyond-Pulsar/Pulsar-Native?

Yes, Far-Beyond-Pulsar/Pulsar-Native currently has 10 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rankâ„¢ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for Far-Beyond-Pulsar/Pulsar-Native are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.