F3-Nation/f3-nation - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

F3 Nation Monorepo

C-Rank Grade: S (Elite) - 71/100

External PR Merge Rate: 77%

Response Time: 1d

First Timer Success: 70%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is F3-Nation/f3-nation welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

F3-Nation/f3-nation has a recorded first-timer success rate of 70.0%. Repositories ranked S typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in F3-Nation/f3-nation respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 31.3 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 71.5 C-Rank™ score (S Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 71.5 places F3-Nation/f3-nation in the S tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for F3-Nation/f3-nation?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for F3-Nation/f3-nation is 77.5%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in F3-Nation/f3-nation?

F3-Nation/f3-nation currently has 18 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

F3-Nation
F3-Nation/f3-nationS•Elite208
GitHub
Back to Explorer
F3-Nation

F3-Nation/f3-nation

208
Active (30d)S•Elite(71/100)TypeScript

F3 Nation Monorepo

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Welcoming Community Builder

Warmth Score
8.3/10
Patience Score
8.4/10
Nitpick Rate
40%

Highly welcoming maintainers in F3-Nation/f3-nation. Prompt code reviews with positive guidance for new contributors.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • •Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • •Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • •Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • •Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
1 days+
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
77.5%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
70.0%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
16 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
77.5%
Merge Gauge
70.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe59/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for F3-Nation/f3-nation
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/F3-Nation/f3-nation)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/F3-Nation/f3-nation?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (5)

View on GitHub

For everyone When someone opens a member's Edit User window in the Admin app, the browser's developer console prints "A component is changing an uncontrolled input to be controlled", and in development a red "1 Issue" badge appears in the corner. Nothing visibly breaks and saving works, but the badge hides real problems from people debugging. This is the same problem as #1185 (which covers the Region/Area/AO edit window), in a second window that #1185 doesn't mention: the user editor. Found during a local test of PR #1150; also happens on main (the PR doesn't touch this file). For the coding agent Root cause. apps/admin/src/app/_components/modal/admin-users-modal.tsx renders the read-only ID field as <Input placeholder="ID" disabled {...field} /> (around line 269). The modal first renders before user.byId resolves, with defaultValues.id: user?.id ?? undefined, so field.value is undefined; once the user loads, the form gets the real id and the input flips from uncontrolled to controlled

📅 Opened Oct 9, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 75/100Contribute

For everyone When an admin opens the edit window for a Region (and the same window is used for Areas, Territories, Sectors and AOs) in the Admin app, the browser's developer console prints a warning: "A component is changing an uncontrolled input to be controlled." Nothing visibly breaks, and saving still works, but in development the warning also shows up as a red "1 Issue" badge in the corner of the screen, which hides real problems and confuses people who are debugging. It happens because the read-only "ID" box in that window starts out empty-and-unset while the organization's details are still loading, then gets a value once they arrive. The fix is a one-line change that gives the box an empty value until the ID is known. Found while testing a different change locally, and it also happens on main. For the coding agent Root cause. apps/admin/src/app/_components/modal/admin-org-edit-modal.tsx renders the ID field as <Input placeholder="ID" disabled {...field} />. For an existing org

📅 Opened Oct 9, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 50/100Contribute

For everyone When a new user finishes the "Welcome" step during sign-in (for example, signing in to the Admin app for the first time), the browser console shows a CORS error and a "Failed to fetch RSC payload … Falling back to browser navigation" message. Sign-in still completes, so nobody is blocked. But the error adds noise to the console and to error reports, and it costs an extra round trip on every first sign-in. Found during a local test of PR #1169; also happens on main. For the coding agent Root cause: apps/auth/src/app/onboarding/page.tsx finishes onboarding with router.push(callbackUrl) (line 103; the 401 path near line 43 does the same with a same-origin URL). callbackUrl is /api/oauth/authorize?..., an API route that answers with a 302 to the client app's own origin (e.g. http://localhost:3002/api/auth/callback). router.push makes Next do a client-side RSC fetch, which follows the redirect cross-origin and fails CORS preflight. Next then falls back to a full navigation. F

📅 Opened Oct 6, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 50/100Contribute

For everyone Why this exists While fixing the cross-org write leaks from #1156, a code review spotted two patterns copied across many API files. They aren't bugs, and they were left out of that fix on purpose to keep the security change small and easy to review. "Does the caller have this role on any of these orgs?" is written out by hand in several places as the same loop. One copy is in user.crupdate, and others are in user.byId, user.byOrgs and the PII-access helper. Each copy is a chance for one of them to drift from the others. "Find the Nation org" is a separate hand-written query in about six places. They don't all agree on how to find it: some take the first nation row, some match by name, and one uses a hard-coded id. The test database has more than one nation org, and that already caused one bug during the #1156 work. What success looks like There is one shared helper for each pattern. Every existing call site uses it, and behaviour doesn't change. For the coding agent Pur

📅 Opened Oct 6, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 50/100Contribute

Summary Follow-up to the packages/db env split (PR #1148). That PR gives the @acme/db CLI (migrate, seed, reset, drizzle-kit, reset-test-db) its own packages/db/.env, following Turborepo's convention that anything run directly owns its env file while library code only reads process.env. This issue tracks the remaining work, which was intentionally kept out of scope of #1148 to keep that PR focused on the DB package. Accurate consumer (correction) apps/api already loads its own apps/api/.env (which defines DATABASE_URL/TEST_DATABASE_URL) and does not read packages/env/.env. The actual remaining reader of the shared packages/env/.env is packages/api (the @acme/api package), whose with-env is dotenv -e ../env/.env -- and drives its test/script commands. Problem After #1148 there are two sources of truth for the test database address: pnpm -C packages/db reset-test-db reads TEST_DATABASE_URL from packages/db/.env the @acme/api (packages/api) test suite reads TEST_DATABASE_URL from package

📅 Opened Oct 4, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 50/100Contribute
Looking for more TypeScript beginner tasks?Explore TypeScript GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for F3-Nation/f3-nation

When evaluating whether to contribute to F3-Nation/f3-nation, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of F3-Nation/f3-nation acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 1 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 77.5% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to F3-Nation/f3-nation

01

Is F3-Nation/f3-nation welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

F3-Nation/f3-nation has a recorded first-timer success rate of 70.0%. Repositories ranked Elite typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~1 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 71.5 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 71.5 places F3-Nation/f3-nation in the Elite tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for F3-Nation/f3-nation?

The external pull request merge rate is 77.5%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in F3-Nation/f3-nation?

Yes, F3-Nation/f3-nation currently has 18 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for F3-Nation/f3-nation are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.