F3-Nation/f3-nation - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

F3 Nation Monorepo

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 67/100

External PR Merge Rate: 78%

Response Time: 2d

First Timer Success: 36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is F3-Nation/f3-nation welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

F3-Nation/f3-nation has a recorded first-timer success rate of 36.4%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in F3-Nation/f3-nation respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 54.5 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 66.8 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 66.8 places F3-Nation/f3-nation in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for F3-Nation/f3-nation?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for F3-Nation/f3-nation is 77.7%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in F3-Nation/f3-nation?

F3-Nation/f3-nation currently has 7 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

F3-Nation
F3-Nation/f3-nationAWelcoming120
GitHub
Back to Explorer
F3-Nation

F3-Nation/f3-nation

120
AWelcoming(67/100)TypeScript

F3 Nation Monorepo

Compare
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Welcoming Community Builder

Warmth Score
8.3/10
Patience Score
8.4/10
Nitpick Rate
40%

Highly welcoming maintainers in F3-Nation/f3-nation. Prompt code reviews with positive guidance for new contributors.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
2 days+
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
77.7%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
36.4%
Accepts new contributor PRs

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
13 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
77.7%
Merge Gauge
36.4%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe42/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for F3-Nation/f3-nation
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/F3-Nation/f3-nation)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/F3-Nation/f3-nation?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (5)

View on GitHub

Affected app apps/api Provide environment information Chromium Desktop Describe the bug Not every api route has .output(). Example: f3-nation/packages/api/src/router/org-chart/index.ts Line 34 in cd58c21 all: protectedProcedure has .outpu() and f3-nation/packages/api/src/router/event-tag.ts Lines 30 to 31 in cd58c21 all: protectedProcedure .input( does not. The .output() is used in api documentation and /docs to tell developers what to expect. It's very important. Link to reproduction https://api.f3nation.com/docs#tag/event-tag/GET/v1/event-tag To reproduce Go to the link above and try to inspect the sample response payload. Additional information ALSO very important, it overrides the return. So if you return 3 properti

📅 Opened Aug 27, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 50/100Contribute

Summary The two Slackbot Docker images (apps/slackbot/Dockerfile and apps/slackbot/scripts/Dockerfile) run as the root user. Every other app in this repo (map, me, auth, admin, api) already runs as a dedicated, limited user instead of root. The Slackbot images are the odd ones out. Why it matters Running as root inside a container is a common security weak spot. If anything inside the container is ever compromised, root access makes it much easier for that problem to spread. Switching to a regular, limited user is a standard, low-risk hardening step — most other containers in this repo already do it. What to do In both apps/slackbot/Dockerfile and apps/slackbot/scripts/Dockerfile, add a dedicated non-root user and switch to it before the final CMD, the same way apps/map/Dockerfile and apps/api/Dockerfile already do (search those files for USER to see the existing pattern — create a system user/group, chown any files that user needs to read, then add a USER <name> line near the end)

📅 Opened Aug 15, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 50/100Contribute

Summary Checklist of small housekeeping items found during an architectural assessment. None is urgent; all reduce confusion for new contributors and AI agents reading the repo. Each checkbox is independently PR-able. Items Delete vercel.json. Contains only {"github": {"silent": true}}, untouched since the initial commit. Apps deploy to Cloud Run + GitHub Pages; this file falsely implies a Vercel integration. Relocate or delete iframe-test.html (repo root). A 14-line manual embed test pointing at http://localhost:3000. If still useful for testing the map embed, move to apps/map/ or docs/; otherwise delete. Remove dead turbo.json output globs. build.outputs lists .expo/** and .output/** (turbo.json:59-60) — leftovers from the t3-turbo template; no Expo/Nitro apps exist. Consider inputs on turbo tasks. No task defines inputs, so any file in a package (README edits, test files) invalidates its build cache. Scoping build inputs (e.g. excluding **/*.md) cuts needless rebuilds. Measur

📅 Opened Jul 9, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 50/100Contribute

Summary Checklist of small, independent, individually-verified performance fixes. Each checkbox is a self-contained ~15-minute PR — good first issues; pick off one box at a time. Items Full lodash import in the shared UI package. packages/ui/src/radio-group.tsx:3 does import { omit } from "lodash"; — pulls all of lodash into the client bundle of every app that uses radio-group. Change to import omit from "lodash/omit"; (the repo already does this correctly in packages/api/src/router/map/location.ts:2). This is the only offending import repo-wide (verified by grep). map.location.regions over-selects. packages/api/src/router/map/location.ts (~:477-489) runs .select() — the entire orgs row including the json meta blob, website, socials — then maps to just {id, name, logo, website}. Use an explicit column projection so Postgres doesn't ship the wide rows. me.profile sequential waterfall. packages/api/src/router/me/index.ts (fetchFullProfile): user, then roles, then positions ar

📅 Opened Jul 9, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 50/100Contribute

Summary Across all six Next.js apps there is exactly one route boundary file in the entire repo: apps/map has a single error.tsx. No app has any loading.tsx or not-found.tsx. Unhandled route errors fall through to Next's unstyled default screen, bad URLs get the generic 404, and server-component navigations show nothing while loading. Evidence Counted with find apps/*/src/app -name "<boundary>.tsx": App page.tsx loading error not-found admin 21 0 0 0 map 8 0 1 0 me 2 0 0 0 auth 6 0 0 0 homepage 1 0 0 0 Why it matters Error UX: any thrown error in a server component (a DB hiccup, a bad ID in a URL) shows users an unstyled crash screen with no recovery path. A root error.tsx + global-error.tsx also gives Sentry a natural reporting hook. Loading UX: admin's 21 data-heavy pages navigate with no pending feedback; loading.tsx enables streaming + instant skeletons for free. This is a high-visibility, low-risk win that suits newer contributors (hence good first issue). Sugg

📅 Opened Jul 9, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 50/100Contribute
Looking for more TypeScript beginner tasks?Explore TypeScript GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for F3-Nation/f3-nation

When evaluating whether to contribute to F3-Nation/f3-nation, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of F3-Nation/f3-nation acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 2 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 77.7% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to F3-Nation/f3-nation

01

Is F3-Nation/f3-nation welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

F3-Nation/f3-nation has a recorded first-timer success rate of 36.4%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~2 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 66.8 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 66.8 places F3-Nation/f3-nation in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for F3-Nation/f3-nation?

The external pull request merge rate is 77.7%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in F3-Nation/f3-nation?

Yes, F3-Nation/f3-nation currently has 7 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for F3-Nation/f3-nation are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.