Exiv2/exiv2 - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Image metadata library and tools

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 66/100

External PR Merge Rate: 68%

Response Time: 5h

First Timer Success: 80%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Exiv2/exiv2 welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

Exiv2/exiv2 has a recorded first-timer success rate of 80.0%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in Exiv2/exiv2 respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 5.0 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 65.8 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 65.8 places Exiv2/exiv2 in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for Exiv2/exiv2?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for Exiv2/exiv2 is 67.7%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in Exiv2/exiv2?

Exiv2/exiv2 currently has 2 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

Exiv2
Exiv2/exiv2A•Welcoming1.2k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
Exiv2

Exiv2/exiv2

1,166
Active (30d)A•Welcoming(66/100)C++

Image metadata library and tools

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

High-Friction Gatekeeper

Warmth Score
5.7/10
Patience Score
6.5/10
Nitpick Rate
56%

Rigorous architecture standards (85% critical review signals). Ensure PRs strictly follow guidelines before requesting review in Exiv2/exiv2.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Add unit tests with >80% coverage for modified code paths
  • •Run repository linter and code formatters locally before pushing
  • •Link relevant GitHub issue ID in PR description pre-flight checklist

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit unlinked PRs without referencing an existing issue
  • •Do not mix refactoring and feature logic into a single commit
  • •Do not ping maintainers repeatedly within 24 hours of opening
Response Velocity
5 hours
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
67.7%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
80.0%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
11 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
67.7%
Merge Gauge
80.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe77/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for Exiv2/exiv2
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/Exiv2/exiv2)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/Exiv2/exiv2?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (2)

View on GitHub

Describe the bug Opening a QOI image file throws exception "read access violation" Error happens on code line: Exiv2::Image::UniquePtr image = Exiv2::ImageFactory::open(filename); I have attached QOI image file I have attached screenshot of VS2022 debug session To Reproduce Steps to reproduce the behavior: Create a simple C++ program that just calls Exiv2::ImageFactory::open: Exiv2::Image::UniquePtr image = Exiv2::ImageFactory::open(filename); Debug program, step over line that opens file Read access exception is thrown Expected behavior Opening QOI file should succeed Desktop (please complete the following information): Windows 11 Exiv2 0.28.3.1, installed via NuGet package StoneSteps.Exiv2.VS2022.Static (https://www.nuget.org/packages/StoneSteps.Exiv2.VS2022.Static/0.28.3.1) Visual Studio 2022, C++ V17 Debug run in VS2022 Additional context Add any other information about the problem here.

📅 Opened Mar 28, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 45/100Contribute

The Metadata reference tables refers to Exif 2.3, I noticed that tag 0x8827 in Exif specification version 2.3 is called "PhotographicSensitivity", whereas in exiv2 it is called "ISOSpeedRatings", which is an old wording - as explained in the specification: "Note that this tag was referred to as “ISOSpeedRatings” in versions of this standard up to Version 2.21". The question is now if wording should be changed in exiv2. Pro: rename will follow naming in referenced specification Con: users may be irritated when the do not find ISOSpeedRatings in output of exiv2

📅 Opened Jan 27, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 45/100Contribute
Looking for more C++ beginner tasks?Explore C++ GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for Exiv2/exiv2

When evaluating whether to contribute to Exiv2/exiv2, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of Exiv2/exiv2 acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 5 hours. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 67.7% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to Exiv2/exiv2

01

Is Exiv2/exiv2 welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

Exiv2/exiv2 has a recorded first-timer success rate of 80.0%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~5 hours. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 65.8 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 65.8 places Exiv2/exiv2 in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for Exiv2/exiv2?

The external pull request merge rate is 67.7%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in Exiv2/exiv2?

Yes, Exiv2/exiv2 currently has 2 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for Exiv2/exiv2 are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.