ElectronNET/Electron.NET - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

:electron: Build cross platform desktop apps with ASP.NET Core (Razor Pages, MVC, Blazor).

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 69/100

External PR Merge Rate: 95%

Response Time: 10d

First Timer Success: 100%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is ElectronNET/Electron.NET welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

ElectronNET/Electron.NET has a recorded first-timer success rate of 100.0%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in ElectronNET/Electron.NET respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 234.3 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 69.2 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 69.2 places ElectronNET/Electron.NET in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for ElectronNET/Electron.NET?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for ElectronNET/Electron.NET is 95.2%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in ElectronNET/Electron.NET?

ElectronNET/Electron.NET currently has 5 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

ElectronNET
ElectronNET/Electron.NETAWelcoming7.6k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
ElectronNET

ElectronNET/Electron.NET

7,603
AWelcoming(69/100)C#

:electron: Build cross platform desktop apps with ASP.NET Core (Razor Pages, MVC, Blazor).

Compare
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Welcoming Community Builder

Warmth Score
9.2/10
Patience Score
9.0/10
Nitpick Rate
25%

Highly welcoming maintainers in ElectronNET/Electron.NET. Prompt code reviews with positive guidance for new contributors.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
9 days+
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
95.2%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
100.0%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
3 core
Small core review team
Diagnostic Health HUD
95.2%
Merge Gauge
100.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe68/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for ElectronNET/Electron.NET
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/ElectronNET/Electron.NET)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/ElectronNET/Electron.NET?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (5)

View on GitHub

I have a few questions regarding the publish output which I couldn't really find an answer to so far: Why is the output so large? The .NET runtime should be around 80-100MB and the electron binary around 150MB. Yet my current output (from the example Blazor Web App project) is more than 500MB as compressed binary. I think some content is also packaged twice. This can be observed either by unpacking the app.asar file (npx @electron/asar extract app.asar <dir>), or by setting asar to false in the electron-builder.json file. The archive content under app.asar/bin seems to exist twice? Is there any way to reduce the bundle size of the electron package? I've seen some reports that claim they managed to reduce their electron apps to below 50MB (or even less in some cases). Is the node_modules directory even required? Furthermore, the startup time from launching the app via the published .exe file seems rather large? Does it extract the content every time you open the app?

📅 Opened Dec 12, 2025💬 16 comments
Quality: 70/100Contribute

Version: 13.5.1 (but confirmed source code was not improved in the latest for this issue) Target: Windows (Windows 11) / MacOS (M Series) What is happening is that during app startup, Electron Dot Net will inspect open ports to use as a setting for spawning the back-end server. There is a brief window between when the port number is selected, and when the back-end app actually starts up to utilize that port. If another app were to also start up during this time, then you get multiple instances attempting to spawn a back-end server using that same port and configuration. This results in a collision of port usage, causing the app to either crash or lock up. Steps to Reproduce: Launch built electron dot net application Quickly launch a second instance Note JavaScript exception that appears

📅 Opened Dec 8, 2025💬 8 comments
Quality: 70/100Contribute

If somebody would be interested in contributing app samples, here are some ideas: How to inject a Preload Script e.g. for setting up IPC messaging between web content and .net ap Build Customization via electron-builder hook scripts like beforePack, afterPack, artifactBuildStarted, artifactBuildCompleted This allows for example to manipulate or replace the *.desktop file for Linux apps A comprehensive sample for electron-builder.json That's something you can hardly find anywhere... Multi-Project Example How you can have a base project with Electron.NET code that is shared by multiple Electron.NET apps ElectronHostHook Sample A sample project, showing just ElectronHostHook without any distractions App Icons Sample A working sample with icons for all 3 platforms (Win, Linux, Mac) Blazor Server e.g. to showcase how to best structure it and how the different parts (client-side interactivity, Electron control, native capabilities) come together (for most of these, I can provide something

📅 Opened Dec 7, 2025💬 3 comments
Quality: 70/100Contribute

According to Electron API docs BrowserView was deprecated in version 29 in favour of WebContentsView. BrowserView: https://www.electronjs.org/docs/latest/api/browser-view WebContentsView: https://www.electronjs.org/docs/latest/api/web-contents-view It is worth looking at this to make sure that API is still relevant and working and add a new one as well.

📅 Opened Dec 4, 2025💬 5 comments
Quality: 55/100Contribute

Is there currently any way to programmatically set/get the zoom level/factor of a window? I believe the electron side exposes a zoom API on the webFrame, but the BrowserWindow and WebContents classes currently don't provide any possibility to use it. I understand that this might not be a very urgent feature, but it would be great to have nonetheless. Likewise, I would also gladly accept any alternative solution to get this to work.

📅 Opened Dec 2, 2025💬 18 comments
Quality: 30/100Contribute
Looking for more C# beginner tasks?Explore C# GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for ElectronNET/Electron.NET

When evaluating whether to contribute to ElectronNET/Electron.NET, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of ElectronNET/Electron.NET acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 9 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 95.2% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to ElectronNET/Electron.NET

01

Is ElectronNET/Electron.NET welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

ElectronNET/Electron.NET has a recorded first-timer success rate of 100.0%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~9 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 69.2 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 69.2 places ElectronNET/Electron.NET in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for ElectronNET/Electron.NET?

The external pull request merge rate is 95.2%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in ElectronNET/Electron.NET?

Yes, ElectronNET/Electron.NET currently has 5 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for ElectronNET/Electron.NET are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.