EdgeTypE/better-deepseek - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

A powerful browser extension that supercharges DeepSeek Chat with custom tooling, persistent memory, and seamless project scaffolding. Generate and download files, run Python in-browser, create PowerPoint and Excel documents, build multi-file projects as ZIP archives, and manage custom skills and characters.

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 61/100

External PR Merge Rate: 90%

Response Time: 3h

First Timer Success: 80%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is EdgeTypE/better-deepseek welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

EdgeTypE/better-deepseek has a recorded first-timer success rate of 80.0%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in EdgeTypE/better-deepseek respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 2.7 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 61.4 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 61.4 places EdgeTypE/better-deepseek in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for EdgeTypE/better-deepseek?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for EdgeTypE/better-deepseek is 90.0%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in EdgeTypE/better-deepseek?

EdgeTypE/better-deepseek does not currently have active "good first issue" tags indexed, but accepts external contributions through standard GitHub issue tracking.

EdgeTypE
EdgeTypE/better-deepseekA•Welcoming626
GitHub
Back to Explorer
EdgeTypE

EdgeTypE/better-deepseek

626
Active (30d)A•Welcoming(61/100)JavaScript

A powerful browser extension that supercharges DeepSeek Chat with custom tooling, persistent memory, and seamless project scaffolding. Generate and download files, run Python in-browser, create PowerPoint and Excel documents, build multi-file projects as ZIP archives, and manage custom skills and characters.

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Empathetic Technical Mentor

Warmth Score
7.5/10
Patience Score
8.2/10
Nitpick Rate
20%

Collaborative maintainer environment in EdgeTypE/better-deepseek. Reviews community pull requests with focus on project quality.

What Contributors Actually Say

Discussions in EdgeTypE/better-deepseek focus heavily on practical implementation feedback, code formatting standards, and issue reproduction details.

Hidden Friction Signals

Unlinked PRs without issue context and changes that fail automated test suites face the highest review friction.

Unwritten Rules

  • •1) Keep PR scope strictly aligned with the linked issue.
  • •2) Ensure local linters pass before opening a review.
  • •3) Maintain full test coverage for modified logic.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Add or update tests for changed behavior before requesting review
  • •Link the issue and include reproduction context in the PR
  • •Call out API, migration, or compatibility impact clearly

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not leave requested test coverage unresolved
  • •Do not open context-free PRs
  • •Do not hide breaking changes in implementation details
Response Velocity
2 hours
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
90.0%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
80.0%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
1 core
Single maintainer review bottleneck
Diagnostic Health HUD
90.0%
Merge Gauge
80.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe88/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for EdgeTypE/better-deepseek
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/EdgeTypE/better-deepseek)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/EdgeTypE/better-deepseek?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (0)

View on GitHub

No cached good first issues currently tracked for EdgeTypE/better-deepseek.

View all good first issues directly on GitHub

Looking for more JavaScript beginner tasks?Explore JavaScript GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for EdgeTypE/better-deepseek

When evaluating whether to contribute to EdgeTypE/better-deepseek, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of EdgeTypE/better-deepseek acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 2 hours. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 90.0% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to EdgeTypE/better-deepseek

01

Is EdgeTypE/better-deepseek welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

EdgeTypE/better-deepseek has a recorded first-timer success rate of 80.0%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~2 hours. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 61.4 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 61.4 places EdgeTypE/better-deepseek in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for EdgeTypE/better-deepseek?

The external pull request merge rate is 90.0%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in EdgeTypE/better-deepseek?

EdgeTypE/better-deepseek does not have open beginner labels indexed currently, but external PRs for bugs and documentation improvements are evaluated via normal issue triage.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for EdgeTypE/better-deepseek are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.