Doezer/Questarr - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Questarr is an *Arr-inspired game manager that helps you discover, track, and automatically download the games you want.

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 65/100

External PR Merge Rate: 68%

Response Time: -

First Timer Success: 50%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Doezer/Questarr welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

Doezer/Questarr has a recorded first-timer success rate of 50.0%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in Doezer/Questarr respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 0.0 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 65.3 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 65.3 places Doezer/Questarr in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for Doezer/Questarr?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for Doezer/Questarr is 68.3%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in Doezer/Questarr?

Doezer/Questarr does not currently have active "good first issue" tags indexed, but accepts external contributions through standard GitHub issue tracking.

Doezer
Doezer/QuestarrA•Welcoming680
GitHub
Back to Explorer
Doezer

Doezer/Questarr

680
Active (30d)A•Welcoming(65/100)TypeScript

Questarr is an *Arr-inspired game manager that helps you discover, track, and automatically download the games you want.

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Constructive Code Reviewer

Warmth Score
7.4/10
Patience Score
7.8/10
Nitpick Rate
33%

Balanced & professional review environment in Doezer/Questarr. Maintains strict focus on technical quality and test standards.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Add unit tests with >80% coverage for modified code paths
  • •Use conventional commit messages and clean branch names
  • •Link relevant GitHub issue ID in PR description pre-flight checklist

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit unlinked PRs without referencing an existing issue
  • •Do not mix refactoring and feature logic into a single commit
  • •Do not ping maintainers repeatedly within 24 hours of opening
Response Velocity
-
No reviewer activity recorded

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
68.3%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
50.0%
Accepts new contributor PRs

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
11 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
68.3%
Merge Gauge
50.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe42/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for Doezer/Questarr
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/Doezer/Questarr)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/Doezer/Questarr?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (5)

View on GitHub

Set default path to {platform}/… Add some guidance in the sw Maybe add a "Help" page in the app?

📅 Opened Sep 26, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 85/100Contribute

Add localization system, crowdsourced preferably

📅 Opened Sep 26, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 75/100Contribute

Use of Jev might be warranted here Problem server/search.ts currently does zero scoring — it aggregates raw Torznab/Newznab results and sorts by pub date only. There's no way to prefer a release group, penalize repacks/DLC-bundles, require a platform match, or reject a wrong sequel/spin-off. Search results are basically unfiltered. What to build A Radarr/Sonarr-style scoring layer, sitting between "search returned raw results" and "show results to user": Title-match classification — distinguish exact match, contains match, and reject ambiguous sequels (e.g. a search for "Dishonored" should not silently accept "Dishonored 2" as a match; a search for "Dishonored 2" should accept "Dishonored 2: Death of the Outsider"). Indexer category classification — decide whether a result is actually a game release vs. something else the indexer returned. Custom formats — user-definable scoring rules matching on title/release-group/uploader/category/protocol, each with a point value. R

📅 Opened Sep 26, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Summary notifyUser() in server/socket.ts calls io.emit(type, payload) with no per-connection scoping: export function notifyUser(type: string, payload: any) { if (io) { io.emit(type, payload); } } The connection handler in setupSocketIO() never associates a socket with the authenticated user (no socket.join(userId) or equivalent), so every notification — game availability, download completed/failed, "Release Flagged for Review" AI holds, xREL releases, Steam sync results, etc. — is broadcast to every connected browser tab, regardless of which user it belongs to. Flagged by CodeRabbit (CWE-200, Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor) during review of PR #1077, which added a new call site but did not introduce the underlying issue — notifyUser() is already called 20+ times from server/cron.ts alone, and has behaved this way since before that PR. Impact On a multi-user Questarr instance, any authenticated user's browser session receives notifications inte

📅 Opened Sep 23, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Follow-up from the CodeRabbit review on #1022 (per-indexer/downloader insecure-LAN credential policy). Two gaps were deliberately left out of that PR as out-of-scope, architecturally larger changes: 1. downloaderAllowsCredentials trusts useSsl, not the resolved request URL server/downloaders/utils.ts's downloaderAllowsCredentials() (and the assertCredentialsAllowed() guard built on it) decides whether a credential may be sent based on the downloader's useSsl config flag. Each client's getBaseUrl()/URL builder, however, keeps an explicit http:// scheme on the downloader's configured url field as-is even when useSsl is true — the two aren't cross-validated. A downloader configured with useSsl: true but a URL field that still literally starts http:// would have downloaderAllowsCredentials return true (trusting the flag) while the actual request goes out over that literal HTTP URL, sending the credential in clear text. Fix: thread the final resolved request URL through to the guard (or v

📅 Opened Sep 16, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 90/100Contribute
Looking for more TypeScript beginner tasks?Explore TypeScript GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for Doezer/Questarr

When evaluating whether to contribute to Doezer/Questarr, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of Doezer/Questarr acknowledge new external contributions in approximately -. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 68.3% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to Doezer/Questarr

01

Is Doezer/Questarr welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

Doezer/Questarr has a recorded first-timer success rate of 50.0%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~-. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 65.3 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 65.3 places Doezer/Questarr in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for Doezer/Questarr?

The external pull request merge rate is 68.3%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in Doezer/Questarr?

Doezer/Questarr does not have open beginner labels indexed currently, but external PRs for bugs and documentation improvements are evaluated via normal issue triage.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for Doezer/Questarr are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.