DitriXNew/EDT-MCP - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

MCP for 1C:EDT

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 65/100

External PR Merge Rate: 87%

Response Time: -

First Timer Success: 100%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is DitriXNew/EDT-MCP welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

DitriXNew/EDT-MCP has a recorded first-timer success rate of 100.0%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in DitriXNew/EDT-MCP respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 0.0 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 64.9 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 64.9 places DitriXNew/EDT-MCP in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for DitriXNew/EDT-MCP?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for DitriXNew/EDT-MCP is 87.0%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in DitriXNew/EDT-MCP?

DitriXNew/EDT-MCP does not currently have active "good first issue" tags indexed, but accepts external contributions through standard GitHub issue tracking.

DitriXNew
DitriXNew/EDT-MCPA•Welcoming300
GitHub
Back to Explorer
DitriXNew

DitriXNew/EDT-MCP

300
InactiveA•Welcoming(65/100)Java

MCP for 1C:EDT

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Empathetic Technical Mentor

Warmth Score
7.5/10
Patience Score
8.2/10
Nitpick Rate
20%

Collaborative maintainer environment in DitriXNew/EDT-MCP. Reviews community pull requests with focus on project quality.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • •Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • •Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • •Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • •Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
-
No reviewer activity recorded

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
87.0%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
100.0%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
8 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
87.0%
Merge Gauge
100.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe65/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for DitriXNew/EDT-MCP
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/DitriXNew/EDT-MCP)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/DitriXNew/EDT-MCP?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (4)

View on GitHub

Ну и совсем шикарно будет кнопку для выбора папки и создания/обновления в ней конфигов ИИ агентов, чтобы не приходилось в каждом отдельно искать и прописывать адрес сервиса. Например у агента OpenCode это делается только в конфиг файле и даже GUI для этого нет. { "$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json", "mcp": { "EDT.MCP": { "type": "remote", "url":"http://localhost:8765/mcp", "enabled": true, } } }

📅 Opened Aug 20, 2026💬 4 comments
Quality: 65/100Contribute

Чего не хватает Наш писатель макетов utils/SpreadsheetTemplateWriter.java умеет из форматирования ячеек только три вещи: wrap (строка 110), columnWidths (97) и rowHeights (98). Три свойства, которые в реальных печатных формах нужны постоянно, задать нечем: нужно что в модели платформы поворот текста BaseFormattingCellProperties.setTextOrientation(int) (есть также isSetTextOrientation() / unsetTextOrientation()) автоподбор ширины колонки Format.setAutoWidthCalculation(boolean) вес доли ширины при распределении Format.setWidthWeightFactor(int) Все три — в пакете com._1c.g5.v8.dt.moxel, проверены по индексу Javadoc EDT 2025.2. Попутно в том же Format лежат ещё два, которых у

📅 Opened Aug 20, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Надо бы как-то разобраться с длинными тире. С буквами Ё вроде разобрались, а вот с другими символами нет. Надо по аналогии с буками Ё сделать тоже самое. Есть такой стандарт https://1c-syntax.github.io/bsl-language-server/diagnostics/InvalidCharacterInFile/ Который запрещает использовать Среднее тире Цифровое тире Длинное тире Горизонтальная линия "Неправильный" минус Мягкий перенос Неразрывный пробел

📅 Opened Jun 14, 2026💬 6 comments
Quality: 65/100Contribute

Текущая ситуация Папка checks/ не включена в сборку плагина. Она лежит в корне репозитория отдельно от папки mcp/, где происходит вся сборка. В финальный ZIP-артефакт (MCP-EDT.v1.22.1.zip) эти файлы не попадают. То есть пользователь: Устанавливает плагин Должен откуда-то отдельно взять папку checks/ Вручную прописать путь к ней в настройках Почему это неудобно Пользователь может вообще не знать, что такая папка существует Нужно отдельно скачивать/клонировать репозиторий ради markdown-файлов Лишний шаг настройки, который легко пропустить Без этой настройки get_check

📅 Opened Feb 14, 2026💬 10 comments
Quality: 70/100Contribute
Looking for more Java beginner tasks?Explore Java GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for DitriXNew/EDT-MCP

When evaluating whether to contribute to DitriXNew/EDT-MCP, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of DitriXNew/EDT-MCP acknowledge new external contributions in approximately -. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 87.0% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to DitriXNew/EDT-MCP

01

Is DitriXNew/EDT-MCP welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

DitriXNew/EDT-MCP has a recorded first-timer success rate of 100.0%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~-. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 64.9 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 64.9 places DitriXNew/EDT-MCP in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for DitriXNew/EDT-MCP?

The external pull request merge rate is 87.0%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in DitriXNew/EDT-MCP?

DitriXNew/EDT-MCP does not have open beginner labels indexed currently, but external PRs for bugs and documentation improvements are evaluated via normal issue triage.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for DitriXNew/EDT-MCP are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.