DioxusLabs/dioxus - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Fullstack app framework for web, desktop, and mobile.

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 64/100

External PR Merge Rate: 34%

Response Time: -

First Timer Success: 29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is DioxusLabs/dioxus welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

DioxusLabs/dioxus has a recorded first-timer success rate of 29.2%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in DioxusLabs/dioxus respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 0.0 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 64.1 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 64.1 places DioxusLabs/dioxus in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for DioxusLabs/dioxus?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for DioxusLabs/dioxus is 34.1%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in DioxusLabs/dioxus?

DioxusLabs/dioxus currently has 7 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

DioxusLabs
DioxusLabs/dioxusA•Welcoming39.4k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
DioxusLabs

DioxusLabs/dioxus

39,378
Active (30d)A•Welcoming(64/100)Rust

Fullstack app framework for web, desktop, and mobile.

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

High-Friction Gatekeeper

Warmth Score
5.0/10
Patience Score
6.0/10
Nitpick Rate
65%

Rigorous architecture standards (100% critical review signals). Ensure PRs strictly follow guidelines before requesting review in DioxusLabs/dioxus.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Add unit tests with >80% coverage for modified code paths
  • •Use conventional commit messages and clean branch names
  • •Link relevant GitHub issue ID in PR description pre-flight checklist

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit unlinked PRs without referencing an existing issue
  • •Do not mix refactoring and feature logic into a single commit
  • •Do not ping maintainers repeatedly within 24 hours of opening
Response Velocity
-
No reviewer activity recorded

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
34.1%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
29.2%
Accepts new contributor PRs

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
66 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
34.1%
Merge Gauge
29.2%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe22/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for DioxusLabs/dioxus
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/DioxusLabs/dioxus)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/DioxusLabs/dioxus?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (5)

View on GitHub

Description In a Dioxus 0.7 web app, PNG assets included via asset!() appear to be re-encoded by default during dx bundle. This can significantly increase the size of already optimized production images. For example, in my project: public/assets/forest-background.png 193K dist/public/assets/forest-background.png 976K dist/public/assets/forest-background-dxh...png 976K The same problem happens with other optimized PNG files: public/assets/forest-background-winter.png 224K dist/public/assets/forest-background-winter.png 806K public/assets/satchel-background-winter.png 212K dist/public/assets/satchel-background-winter.png 1.1M The main issue is that asset!() appears to optimize/re-encode images by default, but for already optimized PNGs this makes the files much larger. Expected behavior By default, asset!() should not change image bytes. I would expect asset!() to: 1. copy/bundle the asset 2. optionally hash the filename 3. preserve the original file bytes unl

📅 Opened Jun 20, 2026💬 4 comments
Quality: 40/100Contribute

Problem on running dx build --verbose --trace --server --fullstack true --features fullstack --release --ssg I get this warning from my browser This page is in Quirks Mode. Page layout may be impacted. For Standards Mode use “<!DOCTYPE html>” Steps To Reproduce Steps to reproduce the behavior: create a new dioxus workspace project (crates: app, pages) put your router inside pages crate and make it public add this to app/src/main.rs use dioxus::prelude::*; #[cfg(not(target_arch = "wasm32"))] #[cfg(feature = "server")] #[tokio::main] async fn main() { rustls::crypto::ring::default_provider() .install_default() .expect("Failed to install ring crypto provider"); let certs_dir = std::env::var("CERTS_DIR").expect("CERTS_DIR must be set"); let rustls_config = axum_server::tls_rustls::RustlsConfig::from_pem_file( format!("{}/server.crt", certs_dir), format!("{}/server.key", certs_dir), ) .await .expect("Failed to load TLS config"

📅 Opened Apr 21, 2026💬 3 comments
Quality: 30/100Contribute

Feature Request You can currently not set the image size for images or set both the width and height. You should be able to set either the width or height and have the other derived from the aspect ratio of the image Implement Suggestion Allow with_width or with_height and derive the other dimension // Resize the image at compile time to make the assets smaller pub const RESIZED_PNG_ASSET: Asset = asset!("/assets/image.png", AssetOptions::image().with_width(52)); or // Resize the image at compile time to make the assets smaller pub const RESIZED_PNG_ASSET: Asset = asset!("/assets/image.png", AssetOptions::image().with_height(52));

📅 Opened Apr 7, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 70/100Contribute

I just realized that the default Rust edition in Cargo.toml file is still 2021 for dx creating a new project. It's 2026 now, lots of Rust crates are moving to edition 2024 so that we can benefit all the improvement directly. It's just a proposal, and I would like to hear your feedback on decision. Thanks a lot!

📅 Opened Mar 24, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 30/100Contribute

Feature Request I want to be able to set the state type on the router that's created when using the dioxus::server::router function. Implement Suggestion The function is located in https://github.com/DioxusLabs/dioxus/blob/main/packages/fullstack-server/src/launch.rs line 96. change it from: pub fn router(app: fn() -> Element) -> Router { //.... } to: pub fn router<State = ()>(app: fn() -> Element) -> Router<State> { // Setting the default to `()` should ensure compatability with existing apps //.... } That way I can do this: dioxus::server::router::<crate::server::state::ArcStore>(App).with_state(store) // a struct wrapped in an Arc You'll probably have to update some of the other functions that expect just a Router like serve.

📅 Opened Mar 20, 2026💬 5 comments
Quality: 40/100Contribute
Looking for more Rust beginner tasks?Explore Rust GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for DioxusLabs/dioxus

When evaluating whether to contribute to DioxusLabs/dioxus, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of DioxusLabs/dioxus acknowledge new external contributions in approximately -. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 34.1% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to DioxusLabs/dioxus

01

Is DioxusLabs/dioxus welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

DioxusLabs/dioxus has a recorded first-timer success rate of 29.2%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~-. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 64.1 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 64.1 places DioxusLabs/dioxus in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for DioxusLabs/dioxus?

The external pull request merge rate is 34.1%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in DioxusLabs/dioxus?

Yes, DioxusLabs/dioxus currently has 7 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for DioxusLabs/dioxus are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.