DefectDojo/django-DefectDojo - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Open-Source Unified Vulnerability Management, DevSecOps & ASPM

C-Rank Grade: S (Elite) - 70/100

External PR Merge Rate: 83%

Response Time: -

First Timer Success: 100%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is DefectDojo/django-DefectDojo welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

DefectDojo/django-DefectDojo has a recorded first-timer success rate of 100.0%. Repositories ranked S typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in DefectDojo/django-DefectDojo respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 0.0 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 70.5 C-Rank™ score (S Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 70.5 places DefectDojo/django-DefectDojo in the S tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for DefectDojo/django-DefectDojo?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for DefectDojo/django-DefectDojo is 83.0%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in DefectDojo/django-DefectDojo?

DefectDojo/django-DefectDojo currently has 2 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

DefectDojo
DefectDojo/django-DefectDojoS•Elite5.0k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
DefectDojo

DefectDojo/django-DefectDojo

4,993
Active (30d)S•Elite(70/100)Python

Open-Source Unified Vulnerability Management, DevSecOps & ASPM

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Active Open-Source Maintainer

Warmth Score
7.8/10
Patience Score
8.2/10
Nitpick Rate
20%

Active maintainer team in DefectDojo/django-DefectDojo welcoming community pull requests and bug fixes.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with repository style conventions
  • •Keep PRs focused and well-documented

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit unlinked PRs without context
  • •Do not break existing automated test suites
Response Velocity
-
No reviewer activity recorded

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
83.0%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
100.0%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
15 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
83.0%
Merge Gauge
100.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe63/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for DefectDojo/django-DefectDojo
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/DefectDojo/django-DefectDojo)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/DefectDojo/django-DefectDojo?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (2)

View on GitHub

Bug description When using the bulk select button to select a given set of findings, proceeding to select the merge button does not respect the amount of findings that have been selected. Always stating that "you need to select at least 2 findings" requiring I deselect and reselect individual findings first on top of the bulk select to merge a large amount of findings. To clarify when actually performing the merge all the findings selected in view are merged, the bug is with the fact you have to unnecessarily reselect findings for the merge button to let you merge. Steps to reproduce the behavior: Go to any list of findings. Use the bulk select to select a subset or all findings. Attempt to use the merge button to merge findings. Intended behavior: When using the bulk selector the merge button should be aware of the quantity selected to allow for merging without needing to explicitly reselect 2 findings. Deployment method (select with an X): [X ] Docker Compose Environment information:

📅 Opened Sep 30, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 50/100Contribute

The current regulation.json fixture is missing several important modern regulations: ISO/IEC 42001:2023 (AI Management Systems) EU AI Act (2024) NIS2 Directive (EU) 2022/2555 DORA (Digital Operational Resilience Act) ISO/IEC 27701:2019 (Privacy Information Management) I would like to add these to the fixture file. Happy to submit a PR if this is approved.

📅 Opened Mar 13, 2026💬 3 comments
Quality: 30/100Contribute
Looking for more Python beginner tasks?Explore Python GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for DefectDojo/django-DefectDojo

When evaluating whether to contribute to DefectDojo/django-DefectDojo, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of DefectDojo/django-DefectDojo acknowledge new external contributions in approximately -. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 83.0% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to DefectDojo/django-DefectDojo

01

Is DefectDojo/django-DefectDojo welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

DefectDojo/django-DefectDojo has a recorded first-timer success rate of 100.0%. Repositories ranked Elite typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~-. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 70.5 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 70.5 places DefectDojo/django-DefectDojo in the Elite tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for DefectDojo/django-DefectDojo?

The external pull request merge rate is 83.0%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in DefectDojo/django-DefectDojo?

Yes, DefectDojo/django-DefectDojo currently has 2 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for DefectDojo/django-DefectDojo are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.