DefGuard/defguard - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Zero-Trust access management with true WireGuard® 2FA/MFA

C-Rank Grade: S (Elite) - 69/100

External PR Merge Rate: 86%

Response Time: -

First Timer Success: 88%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is DefGuard/defguard welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

DefGuard/defguard has a recorded first-timer success rate of 87.5%. Repositories ranked S typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in DefGuard/defguard respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 0.0 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 69.4 C-Rank™ score (S Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 69.4 places DefGuard/defguard in the S tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for DefGuard/defguard?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for DefGuard/defguard is 86.5%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in DefGuard/defguard?

DefGuard/defguard currently has 3 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

DefGuard
DefGuard/defguardS•Elite2.9k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
DefGuard

DefGuard/defguard

2,867
InactiveS•Elite(69/100)Rust

Zero-Trust access management with true WireGuard® 2FA/MFA

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Welcoming Community Builder

Warmth Score
8.2/10
Patience Score
8.4/10
Nitpick Rate
35%

Highly welcoming maintainers in DefGuard/defguard. Prompt code reviews with positive guidance for new contributors.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • •Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • •Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • •Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • •Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
-
No reviewer activity recorded

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
86.5%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
87.5%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
11 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
86.5%
Merge Gauge
87.5%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe61/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for DefGuard/defguard
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/DefGuard/defguard)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/DefGuard/defguard?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (4)

View on GitHub

Problem description Provide UI visibility into the serial numbers of connected devices Solves: Identification of unauthorized device registrations Troubleshooting one device versus another Proposed solution User profile > User devices > Add "Serial number" below "Public IP" Alternatives considered No response Impact Nice to have

📅 Opened Apr 27, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 15/100Contribute

Problem description "Client Configuration Permissions" and "Client traffic policy" shouldn't be a product wide setting. We want to allow certain users to create manual WireGuard configurations or allow some users to allow all traffic. Proposed solution Make "Client Configuration Permissions" and "Client traffic policy" a user/group-based setting. Alternatives considered No response Impact Important

📅 Opened Apr 27, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 30/100Contribute

Description As and administrator I would like to have a dedicated screen in the location that will show all associated devices with this location. Best would be to see all the info about the device: what user is the owner of the device what is the IP(s) of the device when it was last connected (or if it's still connected) from where it was connected (IP) - and maybe flag (of the country and geolocation info, city?) Also would be good to have some filters like: only connected now, never connected, connected within DATE-TIME RANGE, search the name and IP address (may be in one field)

📅 Opened Mar 30, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 30/100Contribute

Problem description We have many IPs that we need to configure for split tunnel - this is quite cumbersome with the current text field in a Location's "Allowed ips" that's present in the 1.6.*. release. It's hard to see what is present (and whether it's valid) and edit what's already there. Proposed solution An improvement might be a managed table, with a single (validated) IP input box as the means to add new entries. The table itself could provide a way to remove entries, and if the IPs could be sorted that would be useful too. I'm thinking along the lines of how some networking apps manage the entry of MAC addresses for wifi endpoint allow lists, that kind of thing. Alternatives considered No response Impact Nice to have

📅 Opened Mar 21, 2026💬 7 comments
Quality: 30/100Contribute
Looking for more Rust beginner tasks?Explore Rust GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for DefGuard/defguard

When evaluating whether to contribute to DefGuard/defguard, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of DefGuard/defguard acknowledge new external contributions in approximately -. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 86.5% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to DefGuard/defguard

01

Is DefGuard/defguard welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

DefGuard/defguard has a recorded first-timer success rate of 87.5%. Repositories ranked Elite typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~-. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 69.4 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 69.4 places DefGuard/defguard in the Elite tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for DefGuard/defguard?

The external pull request merge rate is 86.5%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in DefGuard/defguard?

Yes, DefGuard/defguard currently has 3 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for DefGuard/defguard are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.