CrowCpp/Crow - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

A Fast and Easy to use microframework for the web.

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 58/100

External PR Merge Rate: 52%

Response Time: 20h

First Timer Success: 80%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is CrowCpp/Crow welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

CrowCpp/Crow has a recorded first-timer success rate of 80.0%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in CrowCpp/Crow respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 20.2 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 58.4 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 58.4 places CrowCpp/Crow in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for CrowCpp/Crow?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for CrowCpp/Crow is 51.7%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in CrowCpp/Crow?

CrowCpp/Crow does not currently have active "good first issue" tags indexed, but accepts external contributions through standard GitHub issue tracking.

CrowCpp
CrowCpp/CrowA•Welcoming5.0k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
CrowCpp

CrowCpp/Crow

4,996
Active (30d)A•Welcoming(58/100)C++

A Fast and Easy to use microframework for the web.

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Constructive Code Reviewer

Warmth Score
7.4/10
Patience Score
7.8/10
Nitpick Rate
33%

Balanced & professional review environment in CrowCpp/Crow. Maintains strict focus on technical quality and test standards.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Add unit tests with >80% coverage for modified code paths
  • •Run repository linter and code formatters locally before pushing
  • •Link relevant GitHub issue ID in PR description pre-flight checklist

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit unlinked PRs without referencing an existing issue
  • •Do not mix refactoring and feature logic into a single commit
  • •Do not ping maintainers repeatedly within 24 hours of opening
Response Velocity
20 hours
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
51.7%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
80.0%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
7 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
51.7%
Merge Gauge
80.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe60/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for CrowCpp/Crow
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/CrowCpp/Crow)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/CrowCpp/Crow?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (1)

View on GitHub

I would like crow::json::wvalue to preserve the order in which object members are inserted. My Situation: I use wvalue to generate JSON from structs using C++26's compiletime-reflections for an app that users read directly. I have defined the JSON schemas as structs and have my own serialization/deserialization logic. I insert fields in a logical order, but serialization changes that order, making the output harder to follow. I need to keep the object structure because consumers access fields by name. Preserving insertion order would improve readability without changing the JSON schema. // Uncomment to get lexicographically sorted keys: #include "crow.h" #include <iostream> int main() { crow::json::wvalue value; value["third"] = 3; value["first"] = 1; value["second"] = 2; std::cout << value.dump() << '\n'; } Desired Output: {"third":3,"first":1,"second":2} Current behaviour: {"first":1,"second":2,"third":3} I understand that JSON objects are semantically unord

📅 Opened Sep 29, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 50/100Contribute
Looking for more C++ beginner tasks?Explore C++ GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for CrowCpp/Crow

When evaluating whether to contribute to CrowCpp/Crow, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of CrowCpp/Crow acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 20 hours. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 51.7% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to CrowCpp/Crow

01

Is CrowCpp/Crow welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

CrowCpp/Crow has a recorded first-timer success rate of 80.0%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~20 hours. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 58.4 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 58.4 places CrowCpp/Crow in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for CrowCpp/Crow?

The external pull request merge rate is 51.7%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in CrowCpp/Crow?

CrowCpp/Crow does not have open beginner labels indexed currently, but external PRs for bugs and documentation improvements are evaluated via normal issue triage.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for CrowCpp/Crow are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.