Clinical-Genomics/scout - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

VCF visualization interface

C-Rank Grade: S (Elite) - 72/100

External PR Merge Rate: 82%

Response Time: 1h

First Timer Success: 50%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Clinical-Genomics/scout welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

Clinical-Genomics/scout has a recorded first-timer success rate of 50.0%. Repositories ranked S typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in Clinical-Genomics/scout respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 1.1 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 71.6 C-Rank™ score (S Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 71.6 places Clinical-Genomics/scout in the S tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for Clinical-Genomics/scout?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for Clinical-Genomics/scout is 81.8%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in Clinical-Genomics/scout?

Clinical-Genomics/scout currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

Clinical-Genomics
Clinical-Genomics/scoutS•Elite180
GitHub
Back to Explorer
Clinical-Genomics

Clinical-Genomics/scout

180
InactiveS•Elite(72/100)HTML

VCF visualization interface

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Active Open-Source Maintainer

Warmth Score
7.8/10
Patience Score
8.2/10
Nitpick Rate
20%

Active maintainer team in Clinical-Genomics/scout welcoming community pull requests and bug fixes.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with repository style conventions
  • •Keep PRs focused and well-documented

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit unlinked PRs without context
  • •Do not break existing automated test suites
Response Velocity
1 hours
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
81.8%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
50.0%
Accepts new contributor PRs

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
7 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
81.8%
Merge Gauge
50.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe77/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for Clinical-Genomics/scout
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/Clinical-Genomics/scout)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/Clinical-Genomics/scout?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (4)

View on GitHub

The users report too much of a rainbow on variantS pages, making the actual score hard to read. 🦄 In a way, that is kind of pedagogical, as they tend to rely overly much on the absolute score with non-static rank models, but let's try to be helpful. How about colouring only the norm rank score perhaps? That's the one gating the color anyway.

📅 Opened Oct 12, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 80/100Contribute

So far the howto doesn't say that the submission may fail even is it was validated locally. Improve the documentation describing the status enquiry button. This is how it is now:

📅 Opened Oct 5, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 65/100Contribute

Not sure if bug or intended, but we get a question about this from our users every now and so: The search box for genes to add to dynamic panel on the case page is not triggered for gene symbols shorter than three chars. To add e.g. gene FH, our users have to look up the numeric hgnc-id and use that instead. Noted on scout version 4.112.0

📅 Opened Sep 29, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 80/100Contribute

Compare the Decipher browser:

📅 Opened Sep 24, 2026💬 3 comments
Quality: 65/100Contribute
Looking for more HTML beginner tasks?Explore HTML GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for Clinical-Genomics/scout

When evaluating whether to contribute to Clinical-Genomics/scout, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of Clinical-Genomics/scout acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 1 hours. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 81.8% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to Clinical-Genomics/scout

01

Is Clinical-Genomics/scout welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

Clinical-Genomics/scout has a recorded first-timer success rate of 50.0%. Repositories ranked Elite typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~1 hours. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 71.6 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 71.6 places Clinical-Genomics/scout in the Elite tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for Clinical-Genomics/scout?

The external pull request merge rate is 81.8%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in Clinical-Genomics/scout?

Yes, Clinical-Genomics/scout currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for Clinical-Genomics/scout are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.