ClawBio/ClawBio - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

🦖 ClawBio - The first bioinformatics-native AI agent skill library. Local-first. Reproducible. Open. Free.

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 64/100

External PR Merge Rate: 85%

Response Time: 21h

First Timer Success: 65%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is ClawBio/ClawBio welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

ClawBio/ClawBio has a recorded first-timer success rate of 65.0%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in ClawBio/ClawBio respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 20.7 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 64.1 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 64.1 places ClawBio/ClawBio in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for ClawBio/ClawBio?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for ClawBio/ClawBio is 85.3%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in ClawBio/ClawBio?

ClawBio/ClawBio currently has 2 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

ClawBio
ClawBio/ClawBioAWelcoming1.1k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
ClawBio

ClawBio/ClawBio

1,103
AWelcoming(64/100)Python

🦖 ClawBio - The first bioinformatics-native AI agent skill library. Local-first. Reproducible. Open. Free.

Compare
Jump to:
Response Velocity
20 hours
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
85.3%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
65.0%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
16 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
85.3%
Merge Gauge
65.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe68/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for ClawBio/ClawBio
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/ClawBio/ClawBio)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/ClawBio/ClawBio?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (2)

View on GitHub

Skill affected clinical-variant-reporter Describe the bug In live mode (clinical_variant_reporter.py --input <vcf>, without --demo), ACMG classification aborts with AttributeError: 'list' object has no attribute 'lower' as soon as a variant carries ClinVar annotation. Ensembl VEP returns colocated_variants[].clin_sig as a JSON array. _extract_evidence_from_vep stores that array unchanged: ClawBio/skills/clinical-variant-reporter/clinical_variant_reporter.py Lines 209 to 218 in 97f178e for cv in vep_result.get("colocated_variants", []): if "clinvar" in cv.get("var_synonyms", {}) or cv.get("clin_sig"): sigs = cv.get("clin_sig", "") if sigs and not clinvar_sig: clinvar_sig = sigs

📅 Opened Jul 31, 2026💬 3 comments
Quality: 50/100Contribute

Skill name spatial-transcriptomics What it does End-to-end spatial transcriptomics pipeline for 10x Genomics Visium data. Loads SpaceRanger output, runs QC, clustering, and marker gene detection, then computes spatially variable genes (Moran's I), neighbourhood enrichment, and co-occurrence analysis — all in a single reproducible report. Bioinformatics tools it wraps Squidpy, Scanpy, leidenalg Input / Output Input: 10x SpaceRanger outs/ directory (filtered_feature_bc_matrix/ + spatial/) Output: Markdown report with UMAP, spatial scatter plots, marker heatmap, Moran's I table, neighbourhood enrichment matrix, and reproducibility bundle Why it matters Spatial transcriptomics is now mainstream but there is no ClawBio skill for it. Researchers running Visium experiments currently have to stitch together Squidpy tutorials manually. This skill gives them a one-command pipeline with a demo mode that requires no input data. Are you willing to implement it? Yes, I'd like to build this ski

📅 Opened Apr 24, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 70/100Contribute
Looking for more Python beginner tasks?Explore Python GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for ClawBio/ClawBio

When evaluating whether to contribute to ClawBio/ClawBio, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of ClawBio/ClawBio acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 20 hours. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 85.3% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to ClawBio/ClawBio

01

Is ClawBio/ClawBio welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

ClawBio/ClawBio has a recorded first-timer success rate of 65.0%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~20 hours. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 64.1 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 64.1 places ClawBio/ClawBio in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for ClawBio/ClawBio?

The external pull request merge rate is 85.3%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in ClawBio/ClawBio?

Yes, ClawBio/ClawBio currently has 2 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for ClawBio/ClawBio are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.