COVESA/dlt-daemon - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Diagnostic Log and Trace.

C-Rank Grade: B (Solid) - 53/100

External PR Merge Rate: 29%

Response Time: <1h

First Timer Success: -

Frequently Asked Questions

Is COVESA/dlt-daemon welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

COVESA/dlt-daemon has a recorded first-timer success rate of 0.0%. Repositories ranked B typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in COVESA/dlt-daemon respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 0.6 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 52.8 C-Rank™ score (B Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 52.8 places COVESA/dlt-daemon in the B tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for COVESA/dlt-daemon?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for COVESA/dlt-daemon is 28.6%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in COVESA/dlt-daemon?

COVESA/dlt-daemon currently has 3 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

COVESA
COVESA/dlt-daemonB•Solid459
GitHub
Back to Explorer
COVESA

COVESA/dlt-daemon

459
InactiveB•Solid(53/100)Low Sample (<20 PRs)C

Diagnostic Log and Trace.

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Empathetic Technical Mentor

Warmth Score
7.5/10
Patience Score
8.2/10
Nitpick Rate
20%

Collaborative maintainer environment in COVESA/dlt-daemon. Reviews community pull requests with focus on project quality.

What Contributors Actually Say

Discussions in COVESA/dlt-daemon focus heavily on practical implementation feedback, code formatting standards, and issue reproduction details.

Hidden Friction Signals

Unlinked PRs without issue context and changes that fail automated test suites face the highest review friction.

Unwritten Rules

  • •1) Keep PR scope strictly aligned with the linked issue.
  • •2) Ensure local linters pass before opening a review.
  • •3) Maintain full test coverage for modified logic.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • •Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • •Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • •Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • •Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
<1 hour
⚡ Fast reviewer response

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
28.6%
Selective PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
0.0%
No first-timer merges recorded in window

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
7 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
28.6%
Merge Gauge
0.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe41/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for COVESA/dlt-daemon
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/COVESA/dlt-daemon)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/COVESA/dlt-daemon?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (2)

View on GitHub

When running dlt-receive with the -r option (reconnect interval), the tool is expected to reconnect automatically after the connection to the DLT daemon/server is lost. In practice, -r does not work reliably if the server-side socket is not closed properly (e.g., server crash, network disruption, or any failure mode where the TCP connection does not transition cleanly to a closed/error state from the client perspective). In these scenarios, the client socket can remain in a “connected” state and socket reads can block indefinitely. Because dlt-receive does not configure any socket read timeout (and also does not appear to rely on TCP keepalive probing / dead peer detection), the receive loop can hang forever waiting for data. As a result, the code path that triggers reconnect is never reached, and dlt-receive never reconnects. - Expected behavior If the server becomes unreachable or unresponsive (including cases where the server does not close the socket properly), dlt-receive shou

📅 Opened Feb 3, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 45/100Contribute

I am using the dlt-daemon 2.18.10. The dlt-daemon operating on the QNX target and two gateways configures theusing AUTOSAR based ECU node and another Android dlt-daemon. Below the configuration configured in QNX [PassiveNode1] -> Android DLT gateway configuration IPaddress=x.x.x.x Port=3490 EcuID=ANDR Connect=OnStartup Timeout=10 SendControl=0x03,0x04,0x13 SendSerialHeader=0 SendPeriodicControl=0x03:5,0x13:1 [PassiveNode2] -> Autosar DLT gateway configuration IPaddress=x.x.x.x Port=3490 EcuID=ECUA Connect=OnStartup Timeout=10 SendControl=0x03,0x04,0x13 SendSerialHeader=0 SendPeriodicControl=0x03:5,0x13:1 Problem: Any request to the dlt-control command line example adjusting the log level to all the passive node messages is going through segmentation (Header + Payload), and Autosar is not supporting TCP segmentation. If we control from the DLT-viewer, the DLT-gateway daemon sends the to all PassiveNode message, which is going through segmentation (Header + Payload). Note: I observed

📅 Opened Jan 22, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 45/100Contribute
Looking for more C beginner tasks?Explore C GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for COVESA/dlt-daemon

When evaluating whether to contribute to COVESA/dlt-daemon, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of COVESA/dlt-daemon acknowledge new external contributions in approximately <1 hour. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 28.6% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to COVESA/dlt-daemon

01

Is COVESA/dlt-daemon welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

COVESA/dlt-daemon has a recorded first-timer success rate of 0.0%. Repositories ranked Solid typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~<1 hour. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 52.8 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 52.8 places COVESA/dlt-daemon in the Solid tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for COVESA/dlt-daemon?

The external pull request merge rate is 28.6%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in COVESA/dlt-daemon?

Yes, COVESA/dlt-daemon currently has 3 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for COVESA/dlt-daemon are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.