Boeing/config-file-validator - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Cross-platform CLI tool to validate configuration files across 18 formats. Syntax and schema validation with JSON Schema, XSD, and SchemaStore integration. Written in Go.

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 63/100

External PR Merge Rate: 76%

Response Time: 8h

First Timer Success: 70%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Boeing/config-file-validator welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

Boeing/config-file-validator has a recorded first-timer success rate of 70.0%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in Boeing/config-file-validator respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 7.8 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 62.8 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 62.8 places Boeing/config-file-validator in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for Boeing/config-file-validator?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for Boeing/config-file-validator is 75.6%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in Boeing/config-file-validator?

Boeing/config-file-validator does not currently have active "good first issue" tags indexed, but accepts external contributions through standard GitHub issue tracking.

Boeing
Boeing/config-file-validatorA•Welcoming517
GitHub
Back to Explorer
Boeing

Boeing/config-file-validator

517
InactiveA•Welcoming(63/100)Go

Cross-platform CLI tool to validate configuration files across 18 formats. Syntax and schema validation with JSON Schema, XSD, and SchemaStore integration. Written in Go.

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Strict Quality Architect

Warmth Score
7.2/10
Patience Score
7.7/10
Nitpick Rate
35%

Balanced & professional review environment in Boeing/config-file-validator. Maintains strict focus on technical quality and test standards.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Add unit tests with >80% coverage for modified code paths
  • •Run repository linter and code formatters locally before pushing
  • •Link relevant GitHub issue ID in PR description pre-flight checklist

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit unlinked PRs without referencing an existing issue
  • •Do not mix refactoring and feature logic into a single commit
  • •Do not ping maintainers repeatedly within 24 hours of opening
Response Velocity
7 hours
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
75.6%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
70.0%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
14 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
75.6%
Merge Gauge
70.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe75/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for Boeing/config-file-validator
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/Boeing/config-file-validator)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/Boeing/config-file-validator?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (5)

View on GitHub

Problem cfv preserves multiple consecutive blank lines between mapping entries instead of collapsing them to one: # input (2 blank lines): 1: 2 3: 4 # cfv output (wrong — keeps both blanks): 1: 2 3: 4 # expected (collapse to 1 blank): 1: 2 3: 4 Reproduction Create a file test.yaml: first: 1 second: 2 third: 3 Run: cfv format --fix --no-config test.yaml cat test.yaml Actual: multiple blank lines preserved. Expected: at most one blank line between any two mapping entries. Root cause pkg/formatter/yamlfmt/printer.go — collapseConsecutiveBlankLines exists but is not catching all cases. Likely an off-by-one in the newline counting logic (3+ consecutive TokNewline should reduce to 2 = one blank line).

📅 Opened Aug 3, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Problem cfv normalizes YAML quoted scalars to single quotes when no escape sequences are present: # input: "*v1.Proxy.gateway-proxy_gloo-system": reportedBy: gloo # cfv output (wrong — switches to single): '*v1.Proxy.gateway-proxy_gloo-system': reportedBy: gloo # expected (keep double): "*v1.Proxy.gateway-proxy_gloo-system": reportedBy: gloo Correct rule The quote decision should follow this cascade: Content has escape sequences (\n, \t, etc.) → keep original quote style Content contains a literal " → use single quotes Content contains a literal ' → use double quotes Otherwise → use double quotes (default) cfv currently picks single quotes at step 4. It should pick double. Reproduction Create a file test.yaml: "*v1.Proxy.gateway-proxy": state: Accepted "normal-key": value: 123 Run: cfv format --fix --no-config test.yaml cat test.yaml Actual: both keys switched to single quotes. Expected: both keys stay as double quotes (rule 4 — no embedded quotes, default to

📅 Opened Aug 3, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Problem When a TOML inline table contains an array that was multiline in the source, cfv preserves the multiline form: reqwest = { workspace = true, default-features = false, features = [ "rustls", ] } Inline tables must appear on a single line (TOML v1.0 §5.2). The correct output: reqwest = { workspace = true, default-features = false, features = ["rustls"] } Reproduction Create a file test.toml: [dev-dependencies] reqwest = { workspace = true, default-features = false, features = [ "rustls", ] } Run: cfv format --fix --no-config test.toml cat test.toml Actual: multiline array preserved inside the inline table. Expected: array collapsed to features = ["rustls"] on one line. Root cause pkg/formatter/tomlfmt/printer.go — the inInlineTable flag exists but does not force nested arrays to single-line when the source had them multiline. Fix When inInlineTable == true, always print nested arrays in compact single-line form regardless of their source layout.

📅 Opened Aug 3, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Problem cfv collapses short JSON arrays to a single line when they fit within printWidth: "brackets": [["{", "}"], ["[", "]"], ["(", ")"]], The correct behavior is to always expand non-empty arrays (one element per line): "brackets": [ ["{", "}"], ["[", "]"], ["(", ")"] ], Empty arrays [] and empty objects {} stay on one line. Everything else expands. Reproduction Create a file test.json: {"brackets": [["{", "}"], ["[", "]"], ["(", ")"]],"other": [1, 2, 3]} Run: cfv format --fix --no-config test.json cat test.json Actual: inner arrays collapse to [["{", "}"], ...] on one line. Expected: each inner array on its own line. Root cause pkg/formatter/jsoncfmt/jsonc.go — isInlineArray returns true when prefixLen + valLen <= maxLineWidth. This logic should be removed for JSON arrays. Non-empty arrays always expand.

📅 Opened Aug 3, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

We're preparing the v3.0.0 release and want real-world feedback before it goes stable. We want to try it out in your projects, break it, tell us what happened. Install the RC go install github.com/Boeing/config-file-validator/v3/cmd/[email protected] Or download a binary from the release page for macOS, Linux, or Windows. What's new in v3 New CLI: cfv check, cfv format, cfv format --fix Formatting capabilities with --fix for 9 formats (JSON, JSONC, YAML, TOML, HCL, XML, INI, Properties, ENV) Schema validation via SchemaStore auto-lookup Gitignore-aware file discovery (--gitignore) Known-filename detection (Pipfile, Cargo.lock, tsconfig.json, .clang-format, etc.) Sort keys (--sort-keys) for YAML, JSON, JSONC, TOML, Properties, INI Formatting docs: https://github.com/Boeing/config-file-validator/blob/feat/3.0/website/docs/guides/formatting.md Try it instead of your usual tools Run cfv format --diff . on a repo you normally format with prettier, yamlfmt, taplo, or terraform fmt. Compare th

📅 Opened Jul 17, 2026💬 5 comments
Quality: 80/100Contribute
Looking for more Go beginner tasks?Explore Go GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for Boeing/config-file-validator

When evaluating whether to contribute to Boeing/config-file-validator, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of Boeing/config-file-validator acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 7 hours. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 75.6% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to Boeing/config-file-validator

01

Is Boeing/config-file-validator welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

Boeing/config-file-validator has a recorded first-timer success rate of 70.0%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~7 hours. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 62.8 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 62.8 places Boeing/config-file-validator in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for Boeing/config-file-validator?

The external pull request merge rate is 75.6%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in Boeing/config-file-validator?

Boeing/config-file-validator does not have open beginner labels indexed currently, but external PRs for bugs and documentation improvements are evaluated via normal issue triage.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for Boeing/config-file-validator are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.