BlessedRebuS/Krawl - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Krawl is a customizable, lightweight, cloud-native web deception server and anti-crawler that creates fake web applications with low-hanging vulnerabilities using realistic, randomly generated decoy data and AI-generated HTML templates.

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 66/100

External PR Merge Rate: 79%

Response Time: 2h

First Timer Success: 50%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is BlessedRebuS/Krawl welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

BlessedRebuS/Krawl has a recorded first-timer success rate of 50.0%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in BlessedRebuS/Krawl respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 1.6 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 66.0 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 66.0 places BlessedRebuS/Krawl in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for BlessedRebuS/Krawl?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for BlessedRebuS/Krawl is 78.9%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in BlessedRebuS/Krawl?

BlessedRebuS/Krawl currently has 2 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

BlessedRebuS
BlessedRebuS/KrawlA•Welcoming646
GitHub
Back to Explorer
BlessedRebuS

BlessedRebuS/Krawl

646
InactiveA•Welcoming(66/100)Low Sample (<20 PRs)Python

Krawl is a customizable, lightweight, cloud-native web deception server and anti-crawler that creates fake web applications with low-hanging vulnerabilities using realistic, randomly generated decoy data and AI-generated HTML templates.

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Active Open-Source Maintainer

Warmth Score
7.8/10
Patience Score
8.2/10
Nitpick Rate
20%

Growing Python project in BlessedRebuS/Krawl welcoming community pull requests and bug fixes.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with Python style conventions
  • •Keep PRs scoped and well-documented
  • •Include relevant test coverage for changes

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit unlinked PRs without context
  • •Do not break existing automated test suites
  • •Do not mix unrelated refactors with feature work
Response Velocity
1 hours
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
78.9%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
50.0%
Accepts new contributor PRs

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
2 core
Small core review team
Diagnostic Health HUD
78.9%
Merge Gauge
50.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe75/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for BlessedRebuS/Krawl
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/BlessedRebuS/Krawl)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/BlessedRebuS/Krawl?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (4)

View on GitHub

We could develop a recurrent task (that operates with batches and leverages redis task-scheduler for scalable mode, like other tasks) that takes similar non-suspicious requests from inactive ips (1 week inactivity) and crunches them in a single one. This could dramatically improve performance since the most db-expensive queries are on access-logs table, which is filled with useless non-suspicious requests. An example would be: GET /dasidaniodna GET /daefndisjd GET /sdleijfwmi GET /adlkndawndoia GET /test | | Crunched to V GET /dasidaniodna, ... GET /test

📅 Opened Oct 12, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Since recently, Carto started to require an API key to use map tiles, thus showing watermark on any requests without one. API key should append to the end of request of every tile (e.g. https://basemaps.cartocdn.com/rastertiles/voyager/{z}/{x}/{y}.png?key=YOUR_KEY).

📅 Opened Aug 29, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 75/100Contribute

Description Replace the current regex-based detection engine in Krawl with a Sigma Rules based detection system. Instead of relying only on static regular expressions, Sigma Rules would provide a more structured, scalable, and community-driven way to detect malicious behavior, attack patterns, and suspicious activity. Proposed Changes Remove or deprecate the current regex-only detection logic. Integrate a Python Sigma Rules engine/library for rule parsing and matching (pySigma). Support loading custom Sigma rule files from a dedicated rules directory. Trigger alerts when logs or requests match Sigma detections. Allow hot-reloading or dynamic updates of rules without restarting Krawl.

📅 Opened Apr 16, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 70/100Contribute

Maybe adding an options for privates instances to push/pull their malicious ip on a public blacklist ?

📅 Opened Feb 5, 2026💬 15 comments
Quality: 55/100Contribute
Looking for more Python beginner tasks?Explore Python GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for BlessedRebuS/Krawl

When evaluating whether to contribute to BlessedRebuS/Krawl, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of BlessedRebuS/Krawl acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 1 hours. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 78.9% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to BlessedRebuS/Krawl

01

Is BlessedRebuS/Krawl welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

BlessedRebuS/Krawl has a recorded first-timer success rate of 50.0%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~1 hours. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 66.0 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 66.0 places BlessedRebuS/Krawl in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for BlessedRebuS/Krawl?

The external pull request merge rate is 78.9%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in BlessedRebuS/Krawl?

Yes, BlessedRebuS/Krawl currently has 2 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for BlessedRebuS/Krawl are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.