🔥 Blazingly Fast 🔥 runtime environment for Lua
C-Rank Grade: D (Risky) - 8/100
External PR Merge Rate: -
Response Time: -
First Timer Success: -
ArkForgeLabs/Astra has a recorded first-timer success rate of 0.0%. Repositories ranked D typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.
Maintainers in ArkForgeLabs/Astra respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 0.0 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.
The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 7.5 places ArkForgeLabs/Astra in the D tier.
The external contributor pull request merge rate for ArkForgeLabs/Astra is 0.0%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.
ArkForgeLabs/Astra currently has 3 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".
Growing Lua project in ArkForgeLabs/Astra welcoming community pull requests and bug fixes.
Average Response Latency
Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.
External Acceptance Rate
Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.
First PR Conversion
Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.
Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.
[](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/ArkForgeLabs/Astra?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)
Historical health & responsiveness evolution
External PR acceptance
First PR success rate
50% receive response in
90% receive response in
Maintainer review activity heatmap
Maintainer Strategy: Maintainer Sweet Spot: PRs under 150 lines merge in ~16 hours (81% approval). Large PRs (>500 lines) take ~115 hours (29% approval). Keep your diff compact for rapid review.
📌 Summary The current crypto module in Astra provides cryptographic hash functions such as SHA2 and SHA3 (256/512). However, these functions are not suitable for password storage because they are fast and do not include built-in protections against brute-force attacks. This proposal requests the addition of a dedicated password hashing API using modern, secure algorithms such as bcrypt, scrypt, or Argon2. 🚨 Current Problem Using: crypto.hash("sha2_512", password) or even with manual salting: crypto.hash("sha2_512", password .. salt) is insecure for password storage because: The hashing process is too fast (enabling GPU/ASIC brute-force attacks) No built-in work factor / cost parameter Salt must be implemented manually (error-prone) Does not follow modern security best practices 🎯 Proposed Solution Introduce a dedicated API for password hashing: crypto.password_hash("MY_PASSWORD") And a verification function: crypto.password_verify("MY_PASSWORD", stored_hash) 🔐 Suggeste
Axum already has Server-Sent Events support. https://docs.rs/axum/latest/axum/response/sse/struct.Event.html https://github.com/tokio-rs/axum/blob/main/examples/sse/src/main.rs Can we somehow export its functionality to Lua? I'm not sure about the exact API.
This is not tested yet, but should be. in the current implementation, when saving the file, you can set a single file name to save content as, but in multi file multipart, a folder path should be available instead, or a table to map the names.
Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.
Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.
When evaluating whether to contribute to ArkForgeLabs/Astra, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.
Currently, maintainers of ArkForgeLabs/Astra acknowledge new external contributions in approximately -. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 0.0% were successfully merged into the primary branch.
ArkForgeLabs/Astra has a recorded first-timer success rate of 0.0%. Repositories ranked Risky typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.
The initial maintainer response time averages ~-. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.
The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 7.5 places ArkForgeLabs/Astra in the Risky tier.
The external pull request merge rate is 0.0%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.
Yes, ArkForgeLabs/Astra currently has 3 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.
All metrics displayed for ArkForgeLabs/Astra are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.