Aperivue/medsci-skills - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Agent Skills for medical research — literature search, reporting-guideline & citation checks, statistics, publication figures, submission. Works with Claude Code, Codex, Cursor & GitHub Copilot. Built by a physician-researcher, tested on real publications. MIT.

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 70/100

External PR Merge Rate: 94%

Response Time: 3d

First Timer Success: 100%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Aperivue/medsci-skills welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

Aperivue/medsci-skills has a recorded first-timer success rate of 100.0%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in Aperivue/medsci-skills respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 63.6 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 69.7 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 69.7 places Aperivue/medsci-skills in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for Aperivue/medsci-skills?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for Aperivue/medsci-skills is 94.5%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in Aperivue/medsci-skills?

Aperivue/medsci-skills currently has 5 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

Aperivue
Aperivue/medsci-skillsA•Welcoming325
GitHub
Back to Explorer
Aperivue

Aperivue/medsci-skills

325
Active (30d)A•Welcoming(70/100)Python

Agent Skills for medical research — literature search, reporting-guideline & citation checks, statistics, publication figures, submission. Works with Claude Code, Codex, Cursor & GitHub Copilot. Built by a physician-researcher, tested on real publications. MIT.

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Empathetic Technical Mentor

Warmth Score
7.8/10
Patience Score
8.2/10
Nitpick Rate
35%

Collaborative maintainer environment in Aperivue/medsci-skills. Reviews community pull requests with focus on project quality.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • •Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • •Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • •Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • •Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
2 days+
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
94.5%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
100.0%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
3 core
Small core review team
Diagnostic Health HUD
94.5%
Merge Gauge
100.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe68/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for Aperivue/medsci-skills
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/Aperivue/medsci-skills)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/Aperivue/medsci-skills?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (5)

View on GitHub

skills/peer-review/references/exemplar_reviews/ models how a reviewer turns a finding into a well-phrased comment (currently: AI overclaiming, reference-standard validity, data leakage, missing calibration). Add one more finding type — e.g. missing blinding, small-sample overclaim, inadequate baseline comparator, or multiplicity not addressed. What to do Author a synthetic, from-scratch example (no copied review text, no real citations, English) following exemplar_reviews/README.md. Show the four moves: anchor the location → state the gap → partner-voice (Aczel-compliant) phrasing → severity calibration (design-level → Major #1). Acceptance: new .md matching the pattern, synthetic only, CI green. Pointers: skills/peer-review/references/exemplar_reviews/README.md + the existing examples. Open it in your browser: skills/peer-review/references/exemplar_reviews/ — you can create or edit the file right there, no git and no clone.

📅 Opened Jun 12, 2026💬 4 comments
Quality: 40/100Contribute

Much of the medical-AI agent-skill ecosystem is Chinese-led; a README.zh-CN.md would widen reach. What to do Translate README.md to Simplified Chinese as README.zh-CN.md. Add a one-line language switcher near the top of both READMEs (e.g. English | 简体中文). Keep code blocks, commands, and links unchanged. Acceptance: README.zh-CN.md present + cross-linked, no broken links. Pointers: README.md. Open it in your browser: README.md — you can create or edit the file right there, no git and no clone.

📅 Opened Jun 12, 2026💬 3 comments
Quality: 50/100Contribute

make-figures carries a curated exemplar gallery the Critic Loop scores drafts against. It has two kinds: Flow diagrams (PRISMA / STARD / CONSORT / STROBE / pipeline) live in exemplar_diagrams/ as an image + metadata triple. Non-flow figure "anatomy models" live in skills/make-figures/references/exemplar_plots/ as a single hand-authored .md file that describes, element by element, what a publication-grade plot of that type must contain — authored from scratch as a teaching model, not extracted from any published figure (so no image and no attribution are needed). This issue is about the second kind (the exemplar_plots/ .md models). Already covered (don't re-add these): bland_altman, calibration_plot, clinical_timeline, confusion_matrix, decision_curve, forest_plot, imaging_panel, km_curve, manhattan_plot, mrmc_roc, roc_pr. Add a plot type we don't cover yet — for example: a funnel plot (meta-analysis publication bias), violin / box comparison, swimmer plot, waterfall plot (RECIST

📅 Opened Jun 12, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 30/100Contribute

/manage-refs renders references via journal CSL styles (14 included). Add one for a medical / medical-AI journal that lacks one. What to do Download the official CSL from the Zotero Style Repository (https://www.zotero.org/styles) for a journal not yet covered. Add it to skills/manage-refs/citation_styles/ and note it in that folder's README.md. Sanity-check it renders with pandoc citeproc. Acceptance: valid .csl, README updated. Pointers: skills/manage-refs/citation_styles/ (+ its README). Open it in your browser: skills/manage-refs/citation_styles/ — you can create or edit the file right there, no git and no clone.

📅 Opened Jun 12, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 30/100Contribute

/deidentify ships 11 country PHI locale packs (kr, us, jp, cn, de, uk, fr, ca, au, in, it — Italy arrived in #544). Add one more — e.g. Brazil, Spain, Netherlands, Mexico, Taiwan… What to do Copy skills/deidentify/locales/_template.json to <cc>.json. Fill in that country's PHI patterns (national-ID / phone / postal-code formats), following an existing locale like us.json or de.json. Cite where the format comes from in a comment/PR note. Optionally add a small test row. Acceptance: new <cc>.json valid + patterns documented, CI green. Pointers: skills/deidentify/locales/, skills/deidentify/SKILL.md. Open it in your browser: skills/deidentify/locales/ — you can create or edit the file right there, no git and no clone.

📅 Opened Jun 12, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 30/100Contribute
Looking for more Python beginner tasks?Explore Python GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for Aperivue/medsci-skills

When evaluating whether to contribute to Aperivue/medsci-skills, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of Aperivue/medsci-skills acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 2 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 94.5% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to Aperivue/medsci-skills

01

Is Aperivue/medsci-skills welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

Aperivue/medsci-skills has a recorded first-timer success rate of 100.0%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~2 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 69.7 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 69.7 places Aperivue/medsci-skills in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for Aperivue/medsci-skills?

The external pull request merge rate is 94.5%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in Aperivue/medsci-skills?

Yes, Aperivue/medsci-skills currently has 5 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for Aperivue/medsci-skills are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.