Agent-Field/CodeAF - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Open-Source Software factory for Open Models

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 65/100

External PR Merge Rate: 14%

Response Time: 11h

First Timer Success: -

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Agent-Field/CodeAF welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

Agent-Field/CodeAF has a recorded first-timer success rate of 0.0%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in Agent-Field/CodeAF respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 10.7 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 65.3 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 65.3 places Agent-Field/CodeAF in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for Agent-Field/CodeAF?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for Agent-Field/CodeAF is 14.3%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in Agent-Field/CodeAF?

Agent-Field/CodeAF currently has 16 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

Agent-Field
Agent-Field/CodeAFA•Welcoming131
GitHub
Back to Explorer
Agent-Field

Agent-Field/CodeAF

131
Active (30d)A•Welcoming(65/100)Low Sample (<20 PRs)Go

Open-Source Software factory for Open Models

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Empathetic Technical Mentor

Warmth Score
7.7/10
Patience Score
8.2/10
Nitpick Rate
30%

Collaborative maintainer environment in Agent-Field/CodeAF. Reviews community pull requests with focus on project quality.

What Contributors Actually Say

Discussions in Agent-Field/CodeAF focus heavily on practical implementation feedback, code formatting standards, and issue reproduction details.

Hidden Friction Signals

Unlinked PRs without issue context and changes that fail automated test suites face the highest review friction.

Unwritten Rules

  • •1) Keep PR scope strictly aligned with the linked issue.
  • •2) Ensure local linters pass before opening a review.
  • •3) Maintain full test coverage for modified logic.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Add or update tests for changed behavior before requesting review
  • •Update docs or README when behavior changes
  • •Link the issue and include reproduction context in the PR

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not leave requested test coverage unresolved
  • •Do not ship user-facing changes without matching docs
  • •Do not open context-free PRs
Response Velocity
10 hours
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
14.3%
Selective PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
0.0%
No first-timer merges recorded in window

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
5 core
Small core review team
Diagnostic Health HUD
14.3%
Merge Gauge
0.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe28/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for Agent-Field/CodeAF
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/Agent-Field/CodeAF)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/Agent-Field/CodeAF?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (5)

View on GitHub

Seen on dev@debffabf6. Surfaced while verifying #1424; not introduced by it. What happened The sample tab rows in screen.md and home.md show spacing after home that differs from the actual row after #1424's alignment change. They are presented as visual examples, so the cell positions are part of the instruction. Replication Deterministic (no model). Run codeaf manual "how are conversation tabs laid out", then capture the first row of codeaf chat on a standard-width terminal and compare the spaces following home. The two manual samples differ from the captured row. Where internal/manual/chat/screen.md:103 and internal/manual/chat/home.md:592 at dev@debffabf6 contain the schematic rows; the current rendering is in internal/tui3/hometabs.go. The fix Make the examples accurately show the current row's spacing, or label them explicitly as schematic without implying exact cells. Acceptance e2e: both codeaf manual answers show a tab sample whose home spacing matches a captured codeaf chat r

📅 Opened Sep 24, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Seen on dev@debffabf6. Surfaced while verifying #1415; not introduced by it. What happened The Home screenshot's alt text says scheduled and names the older panel arrangement. The current Home panel is standing; the text gives screen-reader users a description of a different page. Replication Deterministic (no model). Read the Home image alt text in README.md, then run make demo-home and inspect Home's panel headings. The alt text includes scheduled; the live heading is standing. Where README.md:85 at dev@debffabf6 contains Home in two columns: needs you, unread, where you were, running and scheduled on the left; projects, spend and since you left on the right. The fix Describe the screenshot and current Home layout in the image's alt text using the visible panel names. Acceptance e2e: the rendered README's Home image has alt text matching the headings in codeaf chat on a demo home. Unit: a documentation check catches retired Home panel names in current image descriptions. Record the

📅 Opened Sep 24, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Seen on dev@debffabf6. Surfaced while verifying #1415; not introduced by it. What happened The manual says a waiting order appears on Home with when it goes off at the right — in 20h, mon 8:30. The standing panel deliberately leaves the right side blank. A reader expecting the due time there sees none. Replication Deterministic (no model). Run make demo-home, open Home, and compare a waiting row of standing with codeaf manual "when does a standing order go off on home". The page promises a right-side time; the rendered row does not draw one. Where internal/manual/chat/home.md:1681 at dev@debffabf6 contains the promise. The standing panel's row rendering is in internal/tui3/homepanel_standing.go and homecell.go. The fix Remove the right-side-time promise from this Home section and point to the standing place for the due reading, unless the intended design is changed to show that time on Home. Acceptance e2e: codeaf manual "when does a standing order go off on home" describes the same

📅 Opened Sep 24, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Found on santos/dev2 at 008363c98 (#1410). It reaches dev when #1410 merges. What happened The manual locates task.parallel in category spending. /settings shows it under Tasks as tasks at once, so someone following the page searches the wrong section. Replication Deterministic (no model). Run codeaf manual "where is task.parallel", then open /settings in codeaf chat. The answer says spending; the visible row is under Tasks and reads tasks at once. Where internal/manual/chat/tasks.md:4219 gives the wrong category at 008363c98. internal/config/settings.go:2347 defines the visible label and category. The fix Replace the category with Tasks and name the row exactly as drawn. Acceptance e2e: the manual command says Tasks and tasks at once, matching /settings. Unit: a manual probe for the setting reaches the corrected section. The change entry's invalidates notes the former category.

📅 Opened Sep 24, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Found on santos/dev2 at 008363c98 (#1410). On dev@debffabf6 too. What happened The documented command names docs/benchmarks/measure-cli.sh, which does not exist. The executable is docs/benchmarks/performance/measure-cli.sh. The same stale path is on dev. Replication Deterministic (no model). From a clean checkout, run the README's path with --help. The shell reports that the file does not exist. Run docs/benchmarks/performance/measure-cli.sh --help; it prints usage. Where docs/benchmarks/performance/README.md:10 contains the stale command. The script's own example at docs/benchmarks/performance/measure-cli.sh:7 also uses the stale path, at 008363c98. The fix Use the existing performance/measure-cli.sh path in both examples. Acceptance e2e: both documented --help commands execute from the repository root and print the script's usage. Unit: a documentation check resolves every local script path in these examples. The change entry's invalidates names the former path.

📅 Opened Sep 24, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 90/100Contribute
Looking for more Go beginner tasks?Explore Go GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for Agent-Field/CodeAF

When evaluating whether to contribute to Agent-Field/CodeAF, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of Agent-Field/CodeAF acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 10 hours. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 14.3% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to Agent-Field/CodeAF

01

Is Agent-Field/CodeAF welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

Agent-Field/CodeAF has a recorded first-timer success rate of 0.0%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~10 hours. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 65.3 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 65.3 places Agent-Field/CodeAF in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for Agent-Field/CodeAF?

The external pull request merge rate is 14.3%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in Agent-Field/CodeAF?

Yes, Agent-Field/CodeAF currently has 16 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for Agent-Field/CodeAF are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.