AdvancedPhotonSource/GSAS-II - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Home for GSAS-II: crystallographic and diffraction-based structural characterization of materials

C-Rank Grade: B (Solid) - 51/100

External PR Merge Rate: 100%

Response Time: <1h

First Timer Success: -

Frequently Asked Questions

Is AdvancedPhotonSource/GSAS-II welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

AdvancedPhotonSource/GSAS-II has a recorded first-timer success rate of 0.0%. Repositories ranked B typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in AdvancedPhotonSource/GSAS-II respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 0.7 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 51.5 C-Rank™ score (B Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 51.5 places AdvancedPhotonSource/GSAS-II in the B tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for AdvancedPhotonSource/GSAS-II?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for AdvancedPhotonSource/GSAS-II is 100.0%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in AdvancedPhotonSource/GSAS-II?

AdvancedPhotonSource/GSAS-II currently has 3 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

AdvancedPhotonSource
AdvancedPhotonSource/GSAS-IIB•Solid116
GitHub
Back to Explorer
AdvancedPhotonSource

AdvancedPhotonSource/GSAS-II

116
InactiveB•Solid(51/100)Low Sample (<20 PRs)Python

Home for GSAS-II: crystallographic and diffraction-based structural characterization of materials

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Empathetic Technical Mentor

Warmth Score
8.1/10
Patience Score
8.4/10
Nitpick Rate
30%

Highly welcoming maintainers in AdvancedPhotonSource/GSAS-II. Prompt code reviews with positive guidance for new contributors.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • •Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • •Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • •Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • •Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
<1 hour
⚡ Fast reviewer response

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
100.0%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
0.0%
No first-timer merges recorded in window

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
1 core
Single maintainer review bottleneck
Diagnostic Health HUD
100.0%
Merge Gauge
0.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe69/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for AdvancedPhotonSource/GSAS-II
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/AdvancedPhotonSource/GSAS-II)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/AdvancedPhotonSource/GSAS-II?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (2)

View on GitHub

Hello, I have been following the GSAS-II RMCProfile-III tutorial and found a discrepancy at Step 7. Environment: GSAS-II: #5837 RMCProfile: 6.7.9.5 macOS After completing the Rietveld refinement, the fit in GSAS-II is excellent (difference curve is essentially identical to the tutorial). I then used "Operations -> Setup RMC" to generate the RMCProfile input files. The exported files are: GaPO4-X.bragg GaPO4-X.back GaPO4-X.inst GaPO4-X.dat GaPO4-X.rmc6f When I start RMCProfile (before any RMC moves), the initial Bragg agreement is already much worse than shown in the tutorial. The tutorial reports an initial Bragg fit close to the Rietveld result, whereas I obtain Bragg Chi^2/npts ≈ 100 immediately after export. Observations: The GSAS-II Rietveld refinement is excellent. The discrepancy is already present before any RMC moves. Adding FITTED_SCALE to the BRAGG section improves the agreement, but the initial Bragg Chi^2/npts is still around 20. Using both RECALCULATE and NO_RECALCU

📅 Opened Jul 14, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 100/100Contribute

After running the Unit Cells List ``Run k-SUBGROUPSMAG'' command, the General "Make subgroups project files(s)" command should make magnetic .gpx files.

📅 Opened Jun 2, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 75/100Contribute
Looking for more Python beginner tasks?Explore Python GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for AdvancedPhotonSource/GSAS-II

When evaluating whether to contribute to AdvancedPhotonSource/GSAS-II, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of AdvancedPhotonSource/GSAS-II acknowledge new external contributions in approximately <1 hour. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 100.0% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to AdvancedPhotonSource/GSAS-II

01

Is AdvancedPhotonSource/GSAS-II welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

AdvancedPhotonSource/GSAS-II has a recorded first-timer success rate of 0.0%. Repositories ranked Solid typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~<1 hour. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 51.5 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 51.5 places AdvancedPhotonSource/GSAS-II in the Solid tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for AdvancedPhotonSource/GSAS-II?

The external pull request merge rate is 100.0%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in AdvancedPhotonSource/GSAS-II?

Yes, AdvancedPhotonSource/GSAS-II currently has 3 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for AdvancedPhotonSource/GSAS-II are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.