AUTO-MAS-Project/AUTO-MAS - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

多脚本多配置统一管理与自动化工具 | 轻松管理大量脚本并存储多个用户配置、设计自动化任务流、监看脚本日志,大幅提高自动化代理效率与稳定性!

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 64/100

External PR Merge Rate: 10%

Response Time: -

First Timer Success: 9%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is AUTO-MAS-Project/AUTO-MAS welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

AUTO-MAS-Project/AUTO-MAS has a recorded first-timer success rate of 9.1%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in AUTO-MAS-Project/AUTO-MAS respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 0.0 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 63.5 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 63.5 places AUTO-MAS-Project/AUTO-MAS in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for AUTO-MAS-Project/AUTO-MAS?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for AUTO-MAS-Project/AUTO-MAS is 9.8%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in AUTO-MAS-Project/AUTO-MAS?

AUTO-MAS-Project/AUTO-MAS currently has 2 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

AUTO-MAS-Project
AUTO-MAS-Project/AUTO-MASA•Welcoming709
GitHub
Back to Explorer
AUTO-MAS-Project

AUTO-MAS-Project/AUTO-MAS

709
Active (30d)A•Welcoming(64/100)Python

多脚本多配置统一管理与自动化工具 | 轻松管理大量脚本并存储多个用户配置、设计自动化任务流、监看脚本日志,大幅提高自动化代理效率与稳定性!

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Strict Architecture Gatekeeper

Warmth Score
7.2/10
Patience Score
8.0/10
Nitpick Rate
25%

Strict review standards in AUTO-MAS-Project/AUTO-MAS. Ensure PR scope matches issue requirements closely before requesting review.

What Contributors Actually Say

Discussions in AUTO-MAS-Project/AUTO-MAS focus heavily on practical implementation feedback, code formatting standards, and issue reproduction details.

Hidden Friction Signals

Unlinked PRs without issue context and changes that fail automated test suites face the highest review friction.

Unwritten Rules

  • •1) Keep PR scope strictly aligned with the linked issue.
  • •2) Ensure local linters pass before opening a review.
  • •3) Maintain full test coverage for modified logic.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Link the issue and include reproduction context in the PR
  • •Add or update tests for changed behavior before requesting review
  • •Call out API, migration, or compatibility impact clearly

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not open context-free PRs
  • •Do not leave requested test coverage unresolved
  • •Do not hide breaking changes in implementation details
Response Velocity
-
No reviewer activity recorded

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
9.8%
Selective PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
9.1%
Accepts new contributor PRs

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
19 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
9.8%
Merge Gauge
9.1%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe7/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for AUTO-MAS-Project/AUTO-MAS
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/AUTO-MAS-Project/AUTO-MAS)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/AUTO-MAS-Project/AUTO-MAS?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (5)

View on GitHub

在提问之前... 我确认这是需求建议,而不是 Bug 反馈 我已搜索过活跃议题与已关闭议题,确认该需求未被提出过 需求描述 MAS 版本号变化时,自动把数据备份到用户指定的目录: 在设置里选好备份目录(建议放在安装目录外)后开启;备份内容与现有「导出数据备份」(#434)相同。 只写不读:不自动恢复,不碰源数据。清理时只删自己生成的备份文件(按文件名规则识别),目录里的其他文件一律不动。新备份写完后才清理旧的,写失败就不删任何文件。 保留规则:按备份时旧版本号的前两位 主.次 分段(beta 也算在同一段,5.6.0-beta.1 属于 5.6)。 升到 X.Y 时只留 X.Y 本段和上一段,更早的删掉:升到 5.6 时删 5.4.x,5.5.x 留到升 5.7 时再删。 「上一段」按 (主, 次) 取现有备份里比当前段小的最大那一段,不拿次版本号减一:升到 6.0 时上一段

📅 Opened Sep 22, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

当前已经实现在调度台选择某队列启动时可以选择某一脚本开始启动,希望在选择某脚本的情况下可以选择从某一用户开始启动 ui可以复用从某一脚本开始启动的ui,当选择的是队列时,右侧区域可以选择从某一脚本开始,当选择的是用户时,该区域可以选择从某一用户开始

📅 Opened May 23, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 55/100Contribute

背景 脚本设置会把各用户的配置存到按 UUID 区分的目录。编辑页只能拉起配置程序,无法一键打开对应文件夹,手动找路径很麻烦。 期望 在用户编辑页(已有 userId 时)增加「打开配置文件夹」 点击后在系统文件管理器中打开该用户的配置目录 目录尚不存在时自动创建再打开 覆盖通用 / MAA / SRC / MaaEnd 等脚本类型的用户编辑页

📅 Opened May 19, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 15/100Contribute

有的游戏更新了以后当天可能需要手打,专门去修改队列又有点麻烦

📅 Opened May 16, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 15/100Contribute

严重的问题 缺少拖拽提示 这个列表支持拖拽排序,但是视觉上完全看不出来。用户只有把光标移上去后,光标改变,才会意识到这里可以拖拽。 这里更混乱了,外层卡片列表可拖拽,内层子列表也可拖拽,而且都没有任何提示。 一般情况下会在 list item 的最左侧加上图标,暗示用户这里可以拖拽。 例如 可拖拽区域过宽 目前整个 item 都会触发拖拽行为。即便用户点击是的 item 上的一个可交互元素,也会触发整个 item 的拖动动画。 更合理的设计应该是加上前面的拖拽图标后,仅允许图标以及周围一部分区域触发拖拽行为。 不严重的问题 以下是个人偏好比较强的观点,不喜可跳过。 1 无用 Tooltip 图标和按钮文本的含义已经足够明确了。 2 无用 Toast Toggle 按钮本身的状态就足够提示当前是否开启了。除非出错,否则没必要提示。 而且

📅 Opened Mar 13, 2026💬 7 comments
Quality: 70/100Contribute
Looking for more Python beginner tasks?Explore Python GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for AUTO-MAS-Project/AUTO-MAS

When evaluating whether to contribute to AUTO-MAS-Project/AUTO-MAS, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of AUTO-MAS-Project/AUTO-MAS acknowledge new external contributions in approximately -. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 9.8% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to AUTO-MAS-Project/AUTO-MAS

01

Is AUTO-MAS-Project/AUTO-MAS welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

AUTO-MAS-Project/AUTO-MAS has a recorded first-timer success rate of 9.1%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~-. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 63.5 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 63.5 places AUTO-MAS-Project/AUTO-MAS in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for AUTO-MAS-Project/AUTO-MAS?

The external pull request merge rate is 9.8%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in AUTO-MAS-Project/AUTO-MAS?

Yes, AUTO-MAS-Project/AUTO-MAS currently has 2 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for AUTO-MAS-Project/AUTO-MAS are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.