99designs/gqlgen - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

go generate based graphql server library

C-Rank Grade: B (Solid) - 53/100

External PR Merge Rate: 100%

Response Time: <1h

First Timer Success: -

Frequently Asked Questions

Is 99designs/gqlgen welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

99designs/gqlgen has a recorded first-timer success rate of 0.0%. Repositories ranked B typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in 99designs/gqlgen respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 0.2 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 53.3 C-Rank™ score (B Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 53.3 places 99designs/gqlgen in the B tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for 99designs/gqlgen?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for 99designs/gqlgen is 100.0%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in 99designs/gqlgen?

99designs/gqlgen currently has 4 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

99designs
99designs/gqlgenBSolid10.7k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
99designs

99designs/gqlgen

10,748
BSolid(53/100)Go

go generate based graphql server library

Compare
Jump to:
Response Velocity
<1 hour
⚡ Fast reviewer response

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
100.0%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
0.0%
No first-timer merges recorded in window

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
1 core
Single maintainer review bottleneck
Diagnostic Health HUD
100.0%
Merge Gauge
0.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe70/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for 99designs/gqlgen
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/99designs/gqlgen)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/99designs/gqlgen?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (4)

View on GitHub

We use the schema: directive of gqlgen.yml extensively to load shared types and directives. In fact we've used it so extensively that we now have an entire dependency tree. Example: shared_directive.graphql: directive @product( name: String! ) on ENUM_VALUE shared_type.graphql: enum FeedbackType { ANSWER, COMMENT @product(name: "myproduct") } gqlgen.yml: schema: - shared_directive.graphql - shared_type.graphql - schema.graphql We only use @product in shared_type.graphql, not in schema.graphql; we need to remember to add shared_directive.graphql in gqlgen.yml even though gqlgen.yml does not use shared_directive.graphql directly. This is brittle and hard for devs to fiagure out what actually needs to be included in the schema: directive. The ask: Add support for an #include directive in .graphql files. (Or #gqlgen_include, or whatever name makes sense.) This is a comment to most graphql parsers, but gqlgen reads it specially and uses it as an alternate way of loading

📅 Opened Jun 5, 2026💬 4 comments
Quality: 55/100Contribute

Hi, I'm trying to design a federated graphql architecture in which entities can resolve @requires fields that take an array of objects, then resolve them in an efficient way without using the dataloaders pattern. The key issue would be that if a subgraph is to declare a new field that requires other fields that are arrays, e.g.: type Product @key(fields: "id") { id: ID! variations: [Variation!]! @external bestPrice: Float! @requires(variations { price }) } type Variation { price: Float! } is there a way to resolve bestPrice for multiple products in one entity resolution function call without encountering the N+1 problem? I've made multiple attempts using variations of explicit_requires, computed_requires, entity_resolver_multi and goField(batch: true) and shared the outcomes as of [email protected] in this repo: https://github.com/tobby-s/multi-entity-tests The examples are all runnable, there's a curl shared in the repo root to test on each of the examples to trigger debugging p

📅 Opened Apr 23, 2026💬 18 comments
Quality: 70/100Contribute

Hey team, A user recently scanned this repo using Qodo's AntiSlop Scanner. The analysis reviewed 10 recent PRs and found 22 issues, all confirmed to still exist on main. Here's one example: JSON null panics params (transports) Severity: action_required | Category: security In several transports, the body is decoded into a **graphql.RawParams (by passing &params) and then params is immediately dereferenced. A valid JSON body of null can set params to nil and cause a panic when assigning params.Headers/ReadTime (trivial DoS). How to validate: Send a POST request with a JSON body of null to any transport endpoint and observe the nil pointer panic. Agent prompt to fix: In each transport's request handler, add a nil check after JSON decoding: if params is nil after decode, return a 400 error instead of dereferencing it. Check all transports (HTTP POST, multipart, GET, etc.) for the same pattern. Other confirmed issues # Title Category PR 1 Incremental deletes outputs before genera

📅 Opened Apr 4, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 70/100Contribute

Summary When using the SSE transport with high-throughput subscriptions, multiple SSE events can be concatenated into a single data: line, breaking SSE protocol framing and causing downstream parsers to fail with "Invalid message" errors. Environment gqlgen version: v0.17.84 Go version: 1.21+ OS: Linux/macOS (observed in Kubernetes environment) frontend subscribe -> Wundergraph router -> subgraph subscription resolver <->channel of events Expected Behavior Each subscription event should be sent as a separate SSE frame: event: next data: {"data":{"mySubscription":{"field":"value1"}}} event: next data: {"data":{"mySubscription":{"field":"value2"}}} Actual Behavior Under high throughput, multiple events are concatenated on the same line and we receive on the event stream: event: next data: {"errors":[{"message":"Invalid message received"}],"data":null,"extensions":... This causes SSE parsers (including WunderGraph Cosmo router) to fail with "Invalid message received" errors because t

📅 Opened Dec 10, 2025💬 1 comment
Quality: 45/100Contribute
Looking for more Go beginner tasks?Explore Go GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for 99designs/gqlgen

When evaluating whether to contribute to 99designs/gqlgen, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of 99designs/gqlgen acknowledge new external contributions in approximately <1 hour. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 100.0% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to 99designs/gqlgen

01

Is 99designs/gqlgen welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

99designs/gqlgen has a recorded first-timer success rate of 0.0%. Repositories ranked Solid typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~<1 hour. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 53.3 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 53.3 places 99designs/gqlgen in the Solid tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for 99designs/gqlgen?

The external pull request merge rate is 100.0%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in 99designs/gqlgen?

Yes, 99designs/gqlgen currently has 4 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for 99designs/gqlgen are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.